• Corpus ID: 235742777

Consistency in the description of quantum measurement: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself

@inproceedings{Renes2021ConsistencyIT,
  title={Consistency in the description of quantum measurement: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself},
  author={Joseph M. Renes},
  year={2021}
}
Recent extended formulations of the Wigner’s friend thought experiment throw the measurement problem of quantum mechanics into sharper relief. Here I respond to an invitation by Renner to provide a consistent and concrete set of rules for quantum mechanics which can avoid the apparent paradox formulated by Frauchiger and Renner [Nat. Comm. 9, 3711 (2018)]. I propose a slight addition to standard textbook quantum mechanics, in the form of two rules, which avoids the paradox. The first specifies… 

Quantum erasing the memory of Wigner's friend

It is argued that the three apparently incompatible properties used to question the consistency of quantum mechanics correspond to two logically distinct contexts: either assuming that Wigner has full control over his friends' lab, or conversely that some part of the labs remain unaffected byWigner's subsequent measurements.

Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself

A variant of Wigner’s friend Gedankenexperiment where each of the current interpretations of QM fails in giving a consistent description, indicating that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.

A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox

Does quantum theory apply at all scales, including that of observers? New light on this fundamental question has recently been shed through a resurgence of interest in the long-standing Wigner’s

Testing quantum theory with thought experiments

Quantum mechanics is one of our most successful physical theories; its predictions agree with experimental observations to an extremely high accuracy. However, the bare formalism of quantum theory

Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations

The basic rules of quantum mechanics are reformulated. They deal primarily with individual systems and do not assume that every ket may represent a physical state. The customary kinematic and dynamic

In defense of a “single-world” interpretation of quantum mechanics

  • J. Bub
  • Philosophy
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
  • 2020

A No-Go Theorem for Observer-Independent Facts

A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts, which would be common both for Wigner and the friend is derived and is analyzed in the context of a newly-derived theorem arXiv:1604.07422, where Frauchiger and Renner prove that “single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent”.

The View from a Wigner Bubble

In a recent no-go theorem [Bong et al., Nature Physics (2020)], we proved that the predictions of unitary quantum mechanics for an extended Wigner’s friend scenario are incompatible with any theory

Relational quantum mechanics

I suggest that the common unease with taking quantum mechanics as a fundamental description of nature (the “measurement problem”) could derive from the use of an incorrect notion, as the unease with

Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

We attempt to contribute some novel points of view to the "foundations of quantum mechanics", using mathematical tools from "quantum probability theory" (such as the theory of operator algebras). We