• DOI:10.1111/cobi.12567
• Corpus ID: 205021560

Conservation threats and the phylogenetic utility of IUCN Red List rankings in Incilius toads.

@article{Schachat2016ConservationTA,
  title={Conservation threats and the phylogenetic utility of IUCN Red List rankings in Incilius toads.},
  author={Sandra R. Schachat and Daniel G. Mulcahy and Joseph R. Mendelson},
  journal={Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology},
  year={2016},
  volume={30 1},
  pages={
          72-81
        }
}

• Sandra R. Schachat, D. Mulcahy, J. Mendelson
• Published 1 February 2016
• Environmental Science
• Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

Phylogenetic analysis of extinction threat is an emerging tool in the field of conservation. However, there are problems with the methods and data as commonly used. Phylogenetic sampling usually extends to the level of family or genus, but International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) rankings are available only for individual species, and, although different species within a taxonomic group may have the same IUCN rank, the species may have been ranked as such for different reasons. Therefore, IUCN rank may not reflect evolutionary history and thus may not be appropriate for use in a phylogenetic context. To be used appropriately, threat-risk data should reflect the cause of extinction threat rather than the IUCN threat ranking. In a case study of the toad genus Incilius, with phylogenetic sampling at the species level (so that the resolution of the phylogeny matches character data from the IUCN Red List), we analyzed causes of decline and IUCN threat rankings by calculating metrics of phylogenetic signal (such as Fritz and Purvis' D). We also analyzed the extent to which cause of decline and threat ranking overlap by calculating phylogenetic correlation between these 2 types of character data. Incilius species varied greatly in both threat ranking and cause of decline; this variability would be lost at a coarser taxonomic resolution. We found far more phylogenetic signal, likely correlated with evolutionary history, for causes of decline than for IUCN threat ranking. Individual causes of decline and IUCN threat rankings were largely uncorrelated on the phylogeny. Our results demonstrate the importance of character selection and taxonomic resolution when extinction threat is analyzed in a phylogenetic context.