Consensus summary of the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Abstract

Clinicians must not simply decide that a patient with symptoms and a positive diagnostic test has a reason for a specific treatment, and likewise clinicians must not decide that a patient with symptoms and a negative test does not have a clinically important problem. We must also consider the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the diagnostic test and the individual characteristics of the patient. Treatment outcome depends on many factors. Point of service decisions vs population based decisions are obviously different. Each patient presents to the treating practitioner on a given day, at a given time, and it is this picture upon which a plan of care is formulated.

0500'98'00'02'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

3,329 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 3,329 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Andersson1996ConsensusSO, title={Consensus summary of the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation.}, author={G B J Andersson and Morgan D Brown and Jiř{\'i} Dvoř{\'a}k and Robert Herzog and Parviz Kambin and Armin Malter and John A McCulloch and Jeffrey A Saal and Kevin F. Spratt and John N. Weinstein}, journal={Spine}, year={1996}, volume={21 24 Suppl}, pages={75S-78S} }