Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics

@article{Innes2004ConsensusBC,
  title={Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics},
  author={Judith Eleanor Innes},
  journal={Planning Theory},
  year={2004},
  volume={3},
  pages={20 - 5}
}
  • J. Innes
  • Published 1 March 2004
  • Economics
  • Planning Theory
Many critiques of consensus building have been uninformed about the nature of this practice or the theory on which it was built, though there is extensive literature on both. It is grounded in the theory and practice of interest-based negotiation and mediation. It is not grounded in Habermas’ concept of communicative rationality, though theorists have found useful illumination in his ideas. Claims are often made about pathologies of consensus building based on cases where the conditions for… 
Revitalising the political: Development Control and Agonism in Planning Practice
This article argues for a new way of valuing development control planning practices in a democratic society: as agonistic political engagement. Using Chantal Mouffe’s conception of the political, it
Toward a Theoretical Model of Consensus Building
TLDR
The logic of Consensus Building Theory (CBT) is derived and a set of diagnostics for discovering the causes of conflict in a group is derived, and strategies based on CBT for attempting resolution of conflicts are proposed.
Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century
This article makes the case that legally required participation methods in the US not only do not meet most basic goals for public participation, but they are also counterproductive, causing anger
Participatory Planning and Means-Ends Rationality: A Translation Problem1
One of the defining characteristics of the “communicative turn” in planning is the rejection of technocratic instrumental (means-ends) rationality as the principal source of legitimacy for planning
Planning in the public interest? : looking for the 'public interest' in English plan-making
This thesis is about the public interest and how it is articulated in English plan-making practices. It is about recognising that the public interest can be conceptualised in multiple ways and
Putting the "Public" Back into Collaborative Public Management
ion; 2) systems thinking, or seeing reality as a system of causes and consequences; 3) a willingness to engage in experimentation, and; 4) possessing a facility to collaborate. One of the greatest
Can One Actually Say What One Wants? Adaptive Preferences in the Negotiation Process
TLDR
It is illustrated that a deeper understanding of human psychology and the dynamics of negotiation enables a planner to choose a more effective mediation strategy.
Local Community Participation in the Planning Process: A Case of Bounded Communicative Rationality
The article contributes to the discussions of the relationships between planners and the local community, with a focus on the intervention of the planner in reaching reflexivity and just decisions.
Equity, power games and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory learning processes.
Participatory approaches are nowadays widely used, but their designers are facing dilemmas, especially in heterogeneous social contexts. On the one hand, some of them stand accused of being naively
Between conflict and consensus: Searching for an ethical compromise in planning
To resolve conflicts and disagreements in planning, a compromise is often necessary. Where immediate consensus is unlikely and where antagonistic conflicts can lead to worse outcomes, a compromise is
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 66 REFERENCES
The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking
Scholars, government officials, and practitioners have expressed concern over the weaknesses of the federal rulemaking process and the time it often takes to promulgate rules. Given the many
Keeping Public Officials Accountable through Dialogue: Resolving the Accountability Paradox
How can public officials be held accountable, and yet avoid the paradoxes and pathologies of the current mechanisms of accountability? The answer, claims Harmon (1995), is dialogue. But what exactly
Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage: Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning
This article makes the case, based on the authors' observation of and participation in stakeholder-based consensus building, that processes that succeed in producing breakthroughs and innovative ways
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
TLDR
This article proposes that consensus building processes be evaluated in the light of principles of complexity science and communicative rationality, which are both congruent with professional practice and offers principles for evaluation and a set of process and outcome criteria.
The Magic of Dialogue: Transforming Conflict into Cooperation
In "The Magic of Dialogue," famed social scientist Daniel Yankelovich does more than revive the ancient art of dialogue; he reinvents it in a brief, practical form that suits our times. Drawing on
Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction.
General managers face two basic challenges in leading and managing their public bureaus. They are expected to strive for both organizational efficiency and organizational effectiveness. Webster's
The consensus building handbook : a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement
Introduction PART ONE: A SHORT GUIDE TO CONSENSUS BUILDING An Alternative to Robert's Rules of Order for Groups, Organizations and Ad Hoc Assemblies that Want to Operate by Consensus - Lawrence
From Agitation to Collaboration: Clearing the Air through Negotiation
National pollution control policy making has long been defined by conflict and delay. Environmentalists have portrayed their industrial rivals as evil incarnate, while industry has claimed
Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation
Collaborative policy making has become increasingly significant in environmental management, but it is often evaluated by whether or not agreement is reached and implemented. The most important
Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory
This paper examines civic governance in Porto Alegre in terms of deliberative democratic theory, as outlined in Cohen (1997), Fung (1998), and Wright and Fung (1999). Civic governance in Porto Alegre
...
...