Consensus About Climate Change?

@article{Pielke2005ConsensusAC,
  title={Consensus About Climate Change?},
  author={Roger A. Pielke},
  journal={Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={308},
  pages={952 - 954}
}
  • R. Pielke
  • Published 13 May 2005
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Science
In her essay “The scientific consensus on climate change” (3 Dec. 2004, p. [1686][1]), N. Oreskes asserts that the consensus reflected in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) appears to reflect, well, a consensus. Although Oreskes found unanimity in the 928 articles with key words “global climate change,” we should not be surprised if a broader review were to find conclusions at odds with the IPCC consensus, as “consensus” does not mean uniformity of perspective. In the… 

Topics from this paper

Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Fifty-two percent of Americans think most climate scientists agree that the Earth has been warming in recent years, and 47% think climate scientists agree (i.e., that there is a scientific consensus)
Beyond consensus : reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science
The international debate about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and climate science in the aftermath of ‘Climategate’ gives cause for reflection. While the main emphasis lies on
“Agreement” in the IPCC Confidence measure
Abstract The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has, in its most recent Assessment Report (AR5), articulated guidelines for evaluating and communicating uncertainty that include a
Room for climate debate
Room for climate debate: perspectives on the interaction between climate politics, science and the media The present study offers a picture of the complex interaction between climate politics,
Science, Policymaking and the Politics of Climate Change in the U.S. and the E.U.: The co-production of consensus and controversy
Climate change policies present multiple quandaries to the field of public policy and science studies. Despite the prevalent scientific consensus, approaches demonstrate great heterogeneity. With one
Uncertainty and Dissent in Climate Risk Assessment: A Post-Normal Perspective
Uncertainty complexity and dissent make climate change hard to tackle with normal scientific procedures. In a post-normal perspective the normal science task of “getting the facts right” is still
97% Consequential Misperceptions: Ethics of Consensus on Global Warming
Cook et al (2016) presents a collaborative work by several consensus study authors, who claim a 97% agreement by undefined climate science experts that “humans are causing recent global warming.” The
The meanings of climate change policy : implementing carbon reduction in the East Midlands
The UK 2008 Climate Change Act transferred a global policy issue into national legislation, establishing unprecedented targets for reducing emissions justified by scientific evidence. The Act
Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expert Trustworthiness
For many of us, the evidence for our beliefs on anthropogenic global climate change turns on epistemic trust and distrust toward many varied others: researchers, intergovernmental agencies, peer
Trust and the Transformation of Energy Systems
The author looks at diverse concepts and roles of trust in the challenge of decarbonising energy systems, drawing on 25 years of personal experience in the fields of energy and environmental policy
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES
Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science
This paper addresses the views regarding the certainty and uncertainty of climate science knowledge held by contemporary climate scientists. More precisely, it addresses the extension of this
Robust Strategies for Abating Climate Change
Robert J. LempertRAND1700 Main St.Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138Michael E. SchlesingerDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801People are of two
Gambling as Addiction