Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court

@article{Edelman2012ConsensusDA,
  title={Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court},
  author={Paul H. Edelman and David E. Klein and Stefanie A. Lindquist},
  journal={Empirical Studies eJournal},
  year={2012}
}
Ideological models are widely accepted as the basis for many academic studies of the Supreme Court because of their power in predicting the justices' decision‐making behavior. Not all votes are easily explained or well predicted by attitudes, however. Consensus in Supreme Court voting, particularly the extreme consensus of unanimity, has often puzzled Court observers who adhere to ideological accounts of judicial decision making. Are consensus and (ultimately) unanimity driven by extreme… 
Consensus and Ideology in Courts: An Application to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
This article argues that judges suppress dissent when it is costly to do so, and that the cost of dissent depends on the political dimension of the issue broached. It contends that judges who
Measuring Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy
The Supreme Court of the United States primarily impacts society through doctrine created or sustained in their opinions (Hall 2010). Any understanding of the Court's role in American society must
Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Voting
Empirical research on voting in constitutional cases is so difficult because there are so many potential influences on judges and such tremendous variance across countries. Some countries have
Case Salience and the Attitudinal Model: An Analysis of Ordered and Unanimous Votes on the Rehnquist Court
How can we explain when ideology is more likely, and less likely, to influence Supreme Court decision making? We examine this question by comparing ordered and unanimous votes on the Rehnquist Court
Judgment-Rationale Inconsistency In The U.S. Supreme Court
States exercise authority over citizens’ lives and property through the judicial system. In principle, judicial bodies ought to justify this responsibility by providing consistent rationales for
Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court
ABSTRACT Key questions in American politics are whether and why the Supreme Court is responsive to public opinion. Past scholarship has suggested a strong relationship between changes in public
International Judges on Constitutional Courts: Cautionary Evidence from Post-Conflict Bosnia
Hybrid constitutional courts are associated with deeply divided and post-conflict contexts where the impartiality of the domestic judiciary is suspect. Such courts enlist international (i.e.,
Judicial Behavior and Devolution at the Privy Council
Abstract In this article, we study judicial behavior at the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC). British judges in general, and British high court judges in particular, are perceived to be
Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court
This article develops an empirical analysis of judicial behavior in the Spanish Supreme Court, a court of law dominated by career judiciary. We focus on administrative review. The evidence seems to
Ideological Polarization on the Supreme Court
Judicial polarization is an important but underexplored aspect of judicial behavior. This analysis uses a gamut of measures to assess polarization on the Supreme Court across chief justice and
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
The Illusion of Judicial Consensus Revisited: Partisan Conflict on an Intermediate State Court of Appeals *
The decision-making tendencies of judges on intermediate state appellate courts have not been frequently studied because these courts issue few nonunanimous decisions. The high proportion of
The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court
For four decades scholars have sought to explain the rise of dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court. While the specific explanations they offer vary, virtually all rest on a common story: during the
Unanimous decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court: Case stimuli and judicial attitudes
Although behavioral scholars have devoted much time and energy to attempting to explain decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court, they have virtually ignored the unanimous decision. We investigated
Measuring Deviations from Expected Voting Patterns on Collegial Courts
Even where idiosyncratic factors such as ideology play large and consistent roles in judges' decision-making, there are always cases where the patterns of judges' votes confound our expectations. In
Divisions of Opinion Among Justices of the U. S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941.
“We are under a Constitution,” said Charles Evans Hughes when he was governor of New York, “but the Constitution is what the judges say it is …” Several theories of jurisprudence have arisen which
Supreme Court consensus and dissent: Estimating the role of the selection screen
From 1940 to the present, the on-the-record consensus among Supreme Court justices fell precipitously relative to historical benchmarks. This paper first shows that Court consensus is closely
Of time and consensual norms in the Supreme Court
Theory: We argue that levels of concurrence and dissent on the U.S. Supreme Court are functions of "consensual norms." These norms arise from, and are influenced by, the behaviors of the individual
The Judicial Mind Revisited: Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology
The Judicial Process-Christopher P. Banks 2015-02-19 The Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Judicial Politics is an all-new, concise yet comprehensive core text that introduces students to the nature
Consensual and Nonconsensual Decisions in Unanimous Opinions of the United States Courts of Appeals
to divided decisions. Unanimous decisions of the U.S. courts of appeals from two time periods separated by three decades were studied. Contrary to the widespread expectation that most unanimous
On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court
The early 1940s marked a period in which the consensus norms of the Supreme Court experienced a radical and apparently permanent change. The consistent pattern of relatively high cohesion
...
...