Connector-Breaker Games on Random Boards
@article{Clemens2021ConnectorBreakerGO, title={Connector-Breaker Games on Random Boards}, author={Dennis Clemens and L. Kirsch and Yannick Mogge}, journal={Electron. J. Comb.}, year={2021}, volume={28}, pages={3} }
By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph $K_n$ or on a random graph $G\sim G_{n,p}$ is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on $K_n$ and the threshold probability on $G\sim G_{n,p}$ for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual…
Figures from this paper
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Asymptotic random graph intuition for the biased connectivity game
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2009
It is shown that Maker, occupying one edge in each of his turns, can build a spanning tree, even if Breaker occupies b ≤ (1 − o(1)) · n lnn edges in each turn, and a strategy for Maker to occupy a graph with minimum degree c while playing against a Breaker.
A sharp threshold for the Hamilton cycle Maker–Breaker game
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2009
This theorem can be considered a game-theoretic strengthening of classical results from the theory of random graphs: not only does G(n, p) almost surely admit a Hamilton cycle for p = (1 + ε) log n n, but Maker is able to build one while playing against an adversary.
The diameter game
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2009
It is proved that the $2-diameter game has the following surprising property: Breaker wins the game in which each player chooses one edge per turn, but Maker wins as long as he is permitted to choose $2$ edges in each turn.
Biased games on random boards
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2015
This paper analyzes biased Maker-Breaker games and Avoider-Enforcer games and proves that, for every p = ω ( ln n n ) , G ∼ G ( n, p ) is typically such that the critical bias for all the aforementioned Maker- Breaker games is asymptotically b * = n p lnn .
Generating random graphs in biased Maker‐Breaker games
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2015
A general approach connecting biased Maker-Breaker games and problems about local resilience in random graphs is presented and it is shown that for b=on, Maker can build a pancyclic graph that is, a graph that contains cycles of every possible length while playing a 1:b game on EKn.
Positional games on random graphs
- MathematicsRandom Struct. Algorithms
- 2005
The main concern is to determine the threshold probability for the existence of Maker's strategy to claim a member of F in the unbiased game played on the edges of random graph G(n,p) for various target families of winning sets.
Spanning Structures in Walker-Breaker Games
- EconomicsFundam. Informaticae
- 2022
We study the biased (2 : b) Walker–Breaker games, played on the edge set of the complete graph on n vertices, Kn. These games are a variant of the Maker–Breaker games with the restriction that Walker…
Biased Positional Games for Which Random Strategies are Nearly Optimal
- MathematicsComb.
- 2000
It is shown that there exist constants and such that Maker has a winning strategy in G(G; n, q) if, while for the game can be won by Breaker.