Connecting the Dots Between the Constitution , the Marshall Trilogy , and United States v

@inproceedings{Tweedy2018ConnectingTD,
  title={Connecting the Dots Between the Constitution , the Marshall Trilogy , and United States v},
  author={Ann E. Tweedy},
  year={2018}
}

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

A Civic-Republican Vision of "Domestic Dependent Nations" in the Twenty-First Century: Tribal Sovereignty Re-envisioned, Re-invigorated, and Re-empowered

  • See, e.g, Hope Babcock
  • UTAH L. REv. 443,
  • 2005
Highly Influential
10 Excerpts

Ginsburg, J., dissenting) (discussing majority's decisions

  • See, e.g, Wagnon v
  • Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation,
  • 2005
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Mixing Bodies and Beliefs: The Predicament of Tribes, 101 COLtM

  • L. Scott Gould
  • L. REV. 702,
  • 2001
Highly Influential
25 Excerpts

aff'd 293 E2d 463 (9th Cir. 1960)

  • D. Or
  • 1960
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

See Riley, supra note 1, at 838 (arguing against federal control of tribes and noting that "federal control

  • Philip G. Peters, Health Courts
  • B.U. LAW REv. 227,
  • 2008

addressing indigenous peoples

  • Sess, Supp
  • U.N. Doc. A/61/53 (Sept
  • 2007

describing methamphetamine crisis

  • L. REV
  • 2007

allowing the court, under Title VII, to impose reinstatement on an employer, as well as other equitable remedies, upon a holding of intentional discrimination)

  • See, e.g
  • 2006
2 Excerpts

Judicial Regrets and the Case of the Cushman Dam, 35 ENVTL L

  • Jr.
  • 2005

documenting concern for such expectations, which the Court often links to the allotment of reservations and the consequent sale of on-reservation land to non-Indians); see also City of Sherrill v

  • See Frickey
  • Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., 544 U.S. 197,
  • 2005

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…