• Corpus ID: 62792031

Congruent Accuracy of Wrist-worn Activity Trackers during Controlled and Free-living Conditions

@article{Dondzila2018CongruentAO,
  title={Congruent Accuracy of Wrist-worn Activity Trackers during Controlled and Free-living Conditions},
  author={Christopher J. Dondzila and Colleen Lewis and J Rubio L{\'o}pez and Tonya M. Parker},
  journal={International journal of exercise science},
  year={2018},
  volume={11},
  pages={575-584}
}
International Journal of Exercise Science 11(7): 575-584, 2018. To examine activity tracker accuracy for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate in controlled and free-living conditions. Forty participants performed four, five-minute stages (walking: 53.7 m·min-1, 80.5 m·min-1; running: 134.1 m·min-1, 160.9 m·min-1) while wearing the Fitbit Charge HR (FB) and the Mio FUSE (MF) activity trackers. Measurements included steps, energy expenditure (kcals), and heart rate (beats·min-1… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study
TLDR
Investigation of the validity of HR measures of a high-cost consumer-based tracker and a low-cost tracker in the laboratory and free-living settings found that the Polar A370 showed stronger agreement with the Polar H10 and smaller errors, and Accuracies increased with increasing HRs; this was pronounced for Tempo HR.
Validity and Wearability of Consumer-based Fitness Trackers in Free-living Children
TLDR
Preliminary evidence suggests that WFTs can provide comparable HR estimates to a criterion field-based measure and children can wear W FTs for extended monitoring periods in free-living settings.
A Comparison of Multiple Wearable Technology Devices Heart Rate and Step Count Measurements During Free Motion and Treadmill Based Measurements
TLDR
Compared heart rate and step count values for the Samsung Gear 2, FitBit Surge, Polar A360, Garmin Vivosmart HR+, Scosche Rhythm+ and the Leaf Health Tracker in walking and jogging activities, there was no significant interaction or main effects for walking heart rate.
Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Activity Monitors During Common Daily Physical Activities and Types of Structured Exercise: Evaluation Study
TLDR
Two common wrist-worn devices (Fitbit Charge 2 and Garmin vívosmart HR+) show good HR accuracy, with a small negative bias, and reasonable EE estimates during low to moderate-intensity exercise and during a variety of common daily activities and exercise.
Heart Rate Equivalency of the Fitbit Charge HR During Continuous Aerobic Exercise
TLDR
The Fitbit Charge HR is relatively accurate for measuring HR during continuous aerobic exercise, whereas the accuracy of PPG-based HR appears limited at exercise onset, agreement improves throughout the exercise bout and HR differences are negligible.
Measurement of Heart Rate Using the Polar OH1 and Fitbit Charge 3 Wearable Devices in Healthy Adults During Light, Moderate, Vigorous, and Sprint-Based Exercise: Validation Study
TLDR
Compared with the authors' criterion device, Polar OH1 was accurate at assessing heart rate, but the accuracy of Fitbit Charge 3 was generally poor, and the mean absolute percentage error for both devices was deemed acceptable.
Concurrent heart rate validity of wearable technology devices during trail running
TLDR
Until technological advances occur in PPG-based devices allowing for acceptable agreement, heart rate in outdoor environments should be obtained using an ECG-based chest strap that can be connected to a wristwatch or other comparable receiver.
Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study
TLDR
The study reveals that commonly used optical heart rate sensors, such as the ones used herein, generally produce accurate heart rate readings irrespective of the age of the user, but users should avoid relying entirely on these readings to indicate exercise intensities, as these devices have a tendency to produce erroneous, extreme readings, which might misinterpret the real-time exercise intensity.
Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review
TLDR
Commercial wearable devices are accurate for measuring step count, heart rate, and energy expenditure in laboratory-based settings, but this varies by the manufacturer and device type.
Validation of a Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Monitor: Polar OH1.
TLDR
OH1 represents a valid tool to monitor instantaneous HR and training load, especially for endurance sports, and TRIMPs from the OH1 device were inferior to criterion's (except walking and soccer), within a 3% range from reference.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
Convergent validity of 3 low cost motion sensors with the ActiGraph accelerometer.
TLDR
Current findings indicate that the OM, NL, and W4L, ranging in price from $15 to $49, can provide reasonable estimates of free-living MVPA or activity time in comparison with a range of AG walking and lifestyle cutpoints.
Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure.
TLDR
The variability in underestimation of EE for the different activities may be problematic for weight loss management applications since accurate EE estimates are important for tracking/monitoring energy deficit.
How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
TLDR
The results show that the Fitbit Zip and Withings Pulse provided the most accurate measures of step count under all three different conditions (i.e. treadmill, over-ground, and 24-hour condition), and considerable variability in accuracy across monitors and also by speeds and conditions.
Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers
TLDR
The Fitbit Zip is the most valid whereas the reliability and validity of the Nike+ Fuelband is low, and test-retest analysis revealed high reliability for most trackers except for the Omron, Moves app (ICC).
Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed
TLDR
Test–retest reliability and validity of activity trackers depends on walking speed, and in general, consumer activity tracker perform better at an average and vigorous walking speed than at a slower walking speed.
Estimating Accuracy at Exercise Intensities: A Comparative Study of Self-Monitoring Heart Rate and Physical Activity Wearable Devices
TLDR
This study provides one of the first validation assessments for the Fitbit Charge HR, Apple Watch, and Garmin Forerunner 225 by examining heart rate and energy expenditure validity of 3 popular wrist-worn activity monitors at different exercise intensities.
Fitbit®: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking.
Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions
TLDR
Fitbit Flex is shown to have measurement limitations that may affect its potential utility and validity for measuring PA attributes in free-living conditions and interdevice comparisons revealed similar measures of exercise intensity.
Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers
TLDR
The evidence reviewed indicated high interdevice reliability for steps, distance, energy expenditure, and sleep for certain Fitbit models, and consistency between the devices was high.
Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities.
TLDR
The wristband activity monitors examined were more accurate for measuring step counts between 80 and 134 m·min as compared with a slower speed and less error when worn on the nondominant wrist.
...
1
2
3
...