Confusion in cladism

@article{Williams2004ConfusionIC,
  title={Confusion in cladism},
  author={Patricia A. H. Williams},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={91},
  pages={135-152}
}
In Phylogenetic Systematics (1966), Willi Hennig conflates the Linnaean hierarchy with what Hennig refers to as the “divisional hierarchy”. In doing so, he lays the foundations of that school of biological taxonomy known as “cladism” on a philosophically ambiguous basis. This paper compares and contrasts the two hierarchies and demonstrates that Hennig conflates them. It shows that Hennig's followers also conflate them. Finally, it illuminates five persistent problems in cladism by suggesting… 

Hennig’s enkaptic system

  • O. Rieppel
  • Biology
    Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society
  • 2009
TLDR
The concept of enkapsis is explored, and the way Hennig used it as a basis for the unification of his phylogenetic system, which was characterized as an enkaptic hierarchy.

‘Total evidence’ in phylogenetic systematics

TLDR
This paper explores how empiricist assumptions are embedded in phylogenetic systematics, and why these assumptions are problematic for cladists (or any taxonomists).

From types to individuals: Hennig’s ontology and the development of phylogenetic systematics

  • A. Hamilton
  • Philosophy
    Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society
  • 2012
TLDR
Understanding Hennig’s ontology illuminates his responses to objections to phylogenetic systematics from both sides of the Atlantic and sheds substantial light on the extinction part of the dichotomy rule.

The Gegenbaur Transformation: a paradigm change in comparative biology

TLDR
This paper traces the development of phylogenetic systematics from Gegenbaur through the work of Adolf Naef to Walter Zimmermann and Willi Hennig.

Character Analysis in Cladistics: Abstraction, Reification, and the Search for Objectivity

TLDR
The dangers of character reification for cladistic inference are explored and the employment of objectivity criteria that give us good methods for identifying robust primary homology statements are identified.

Confusion in philosophy: A comment on Williams (1992)

TLDR
It is demonstrated that Williams has seriously misunderstood many modern commentators on this subject and all of her “five persistent problems” are derivable from this misunderstanding.

REPLY TO COMMENT BY THERIOT (2008) ON KACZMARSKA ET AL. (2006) 1

TLDR
This rebuttal focuses on the major contentious issues to show the patterns of errors and misrepresentations in Theriot’s (2008) presentation of the work and in his conclusions.

The series, the network, and the tree: changing metaphors of order in nature

TLDR
In ‘Questioning the Tree of Life’, it seems beneficial to draw at least four conceptual distinctions: pattern reconstruction versus process explanation as different epistemological approaches to the study of phylogeny; open versus closed systems as expressions of different kinds of population (species) structures; phylogenetic trees versus cladograms as representations of evolutionary processes versus patterns of relationships; and genes versus species as expression of different levels of causal integration and evolutionary transformation.

Adolf Naef (1883–1949): On Foundational Concepts and Principles of Systematic Morphology

TLDR
An English translation of a previously unpublished typescript from Naef’s estate is presented, which Naef intended as the introduction to a textbook on Comparative Anatomy for which he was unable to find a publisher before his sudden death in 1949.

Beyond Set Theory: The Relationship between Logic and Taxonomy from the Early 1930 to 1960

ion.” 298 Simpson and Roe made this clear when they considered the case where the tails of the normal curve approached the x-axis asymptotically. From a mathematical perspective, this kind of

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES

Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance

TLDR
It's coming again, the new collection that this site has; the favorite systematics and biogeography cladistics and vicariance book as the choice today.

THE LIMITS OF CLADISM

TLDR
This paper argues that a better alternative is to work toward improving methods of cladistic analysis (or else to supplement them with other methods) so that such features of phylogeny can be discerned and to devise methods of representation capable of representing them in both cladograms and classifications.

Contemporary Systematic Philosophies

TLDR
This phenetic school of taxonomy had its origins in a series of papers in which several workers attempted to quantify the processes and procedures used by taxonomists to classify organisms, of special interest was the process of weighting.

FROM BIOLOGY TO MATHEMATICS*

  • J. Woodger
  • Education
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1952
TLDR
The object of the present paper is to make some suggestions towards removing limitations of the language WL.

The language of taxonomy.