Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises

  title={Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises},
  author={Raymond S. Nickerson},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  pages={175 - 220}
  • R. Nickerson
  • Published 1 June 1998
  • Psychology
  • Review of General Psychology
Confirmation bias, as the term is typically used in the psychological literature, connotes the seeking or interpreting of evidence in ways that are partial to existing beliefs, expectations, or a hypothesis in hand. The author reviews evidence of such a bias in a variety of guises and gives examples of its operation in several practical contexts. Possible explanations are considered, and the question of its utility or disutility is discussed. 

Tables from this paper

Confirmation bias

Confirmation bias, also called my-side bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's beliefs or hypotheses, while giving

Considering Confirmation Bias in Design and Design Research

The relevance of confirmation bias with respect to its potential to influence designers and design researchers is discussed and the results of the experimental study that suggest confirmation bias may skew data evaluation in design research, contributing to deviations from scientifically accurate conclusions are discussed.

The chronometrics of confirmation bias: Evidence for the inhibition of intuitive judgements

Abstract Mercier & Sperber (M&S) claim that the phenomenon of belief bias – which they consider to be an archetypal manifestation of a general confirmation bias in human reasoning – provides

The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion

Behavioral research has revealed how normal human cognitive processes can tend to lead us astray. But do these affect economic researchers, ourselves? This article explores the consequences of

Confirmation bias without rhyme or reason

Having a confirmation bias sometimes leads us to hold inaccurate beliefs. So, the puzzle goes: why do we have it? According to the influential argumentative theory of reasoning, confirmation bias

Individual differences in the susceptibility to confirmation bias

Confirmation bias refers to the tendency to prioritise confirming over disconfirming information. A closer look reveals that confirmation bias actually consists of various aspects such as ignoring

Collection Development and the Psychology of Bias

The library literature addressing the role of bias in collection development emphasizes a philosophical approach. It is based on the notion that bias can be controlled by the conscious act of

Banker Compensation and Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias refers to cognitive errors that bias one towards one's own prior beliefs. A vast empirical literature documents its existence and psychologists identify it as one of the most

Understanding how shared expectations can shape reality: an examination of the underlying mechanisms in the accumulation of perceptual bias effects

This research examined the underlying mechanisms in the accumulation of perceptual bias effects within the context of a criminal investigation. Biased assimilation processes, including the tendency

Wishful Thinking and Values in Science

  • D. Steel
  • Philosophy, Psychology
    Philosophy of Science
  • 2018
This article examines the concept of wishful thinking in philosophical literature on science and values. It suggests that this term tends to be used in an overly broad manner that fails to




This study reviews the literature on selective exposure to information and re-analyzes prevalent theories by pointing up existing knowledge regarding the extent to which communication bias and

Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence

People who hold strong opinions on complex social issues are likely to examine relevant empirical evidence in a biased manner. They are apt to accept "confirming" evidence at face value while

Bias and error in human judgment

Currently prevalent views of human inference are contrasted with an integrated theory of the epistemic process. The prevailing views are characterized by the following orienting assumptions: (1)

Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: a reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena.

A model is developed to account for variations in test strategies, beginning with the premise that cognitive processes are adapted to reducing particularly costly errors rather than to detecting "truth" and outlines how error minimization goals might produce data preferences coincidentally consistent with normative prescriptions.

Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment.

In two separate but conceptually parallel experiments, the induction of a consider-the-opposite strategy had greater corrective effect than more demand-laden alternative instructions to be as fair and unbiased as possible.

The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac Items

Abstract The paper argues for an ecological approach to realism of confidence in general knowledge. It is stressed that choice of answer to almanac items and confidence judgments derive from

Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference

Numerous authors (e.g., Popper, 1959) argue that scientists should try to falsify rather than confirm theories. However, recent empirical work (Wason and Johnson-Laird, 1972) suggests the existence

Confirmation and Matching Biases in Hypothesis Testing

  • J. BeattieJ. Baron
  • Psychology, Biology
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology
  • 1988
A number of investigators have claimed that subjects show confirmation bias on a variety of reasoning tasks. However, subjects who were classified as “confirming” had often selected evidence that


  • S. Oskamp
  • Psychology
    Journal of consulting psychology
  • 1965
This study investigated whether that increase in confidence in the psychologist's conclusions is justified by a corresponding increase in accuracy of conclusions, and found that the diagnostic confidence of experienced psychologists is less than that of less experienced persons.