Confining ‘Disenhanced’ Animals

@article{Hadley2012ConfiningA,
  title={Confining ‘Disenhanced’ Animals},
  author={John Hadley},
  journal={NanoEthics},
  year={2012},
  volume={6},
  pages={41-46}
}
  • J. Hadley
  • Published 30 March 2012
  • Philosophy
  • NanoEthics
Drawing upon evolutionary theory and the work of Daniel Dennett and Nicholas Agar, I offer an argument for broadening discussion of the ethics of disenhancement beyond animal welfare concerns to a consideration of animal “biopreferences”. Short of rendering animals completely unconscious or decerebrate, it is reasonable to suggest that disenhanced animals will continue to have some preferences. To the extent that these preferences can be understood as what Agar refers to as “plausible… 
Making Better Sense of Animal Disenhancement: A Reply to Henschke
In "Making Sense of Animal Disenhancement" Adam Henschke provides a framework for fully understanding and evaluating animal disenhancement. His conclusion is that animal disenhancement is neither
Animal Enhancement: Technovisionary Paternalism and the Colonisation of Nature
This chapter reconstructs the debate around animal enhancement and describes what is currently being done in experimental research. It then goes on to show how visions of animal enhancement are
Biotechnology as End Game: Ontological and Ethical Collapse in the “Biotech Century”
TLDR
The aim of this paper is to offer an alternative analysis of the ontological and ethical implications of biotechnology from the standpoint of Marcuse and Ellul’s critical theory of technology.
Animals and Technoscientific Developments: Getting Out of Invisibility
The essays in the section “Animals in technoscientific developments” have been collected from the submissions to the 3rd European Conference of Critical Animal Studies that I organized in Karlsruhe
Animals and Technoscience
The current issue of our journal features a special section on technoscientific developments and animals, an extremely sensitive and highly politicized issue. There is widespread unease and even
Animals and War: Anthropocentrism and Technoscience
We are at the crux of a return of animals to the battlefield. Framed as an improvement over current limitations of biomimetic devices, couplings of microelectrical mechanical systems (MEMS) with
No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
TLDR
This paper argues that the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson
In his paper “The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken problem” (Nanoethics 2:305–316, 2008) Paul Thompson argues that the possibility of “disenhancing” animals in
Invertebrate Minds: A Challenge for Ethical Theory
This paper argues that navigating insects and spiders possess a degree of mindedness that makes them appropriate (in the sense of “possible”) objects of sympathy and moral concern. For the evidence
The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken Problem
Nanotechnologies that have been linked to the possibility of enhancing cognitive capabilities of human beings might also be deployed to reduce or eliminate such capabilities in non-human vertebrate
The Philosophy of Animal Minds: A language of baboon thought?
Does thought precede language, or the other way around? How does having a language affect our thoughts? Who has a language, and who can think? These questions have traditionally been addressed by
Darwinism and its discontents
TLDR
Ruse points out that evolution remains the best explanation of the fact that “missing links” have been popping up regularly since Darwin’s day, with no countervailing finds; that phylogenies first established by traditional systematic methods have been corroborated, except for details, by phylogenetic systematics; and that recently these phylogenies have been shown to be beautifully consilient with molecular sequencing data coming from a flood of genome sequencing projects.
Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective
TLDR
This book explains why the question of animal consciousness might not matter very much and explains the 'explanatory gap' between natural theories of consciousness and dual content theory.
In defense of animals : the second wave
TLDR
This chapter discusses Peter Singer's work as an activist, the role of the media, and the challenges of living and working in defense of animals in the age of social media.
Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
TLDR
The current limitations of human mindreading—whether scientifically aided or not—have practical consequences for the rational justification of claims about which rights non-human animals should be accorded.
The Philosophy of Animal Minds
Philosophy of animal minds: an introduction Robert W. Lurz 1. What do animals think? Dale Jamieson 2. Attributing mental representations to animals Eric Saidel 3. Chrysippus's dog as a case study in
Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism
Darwin's discovery how evolution and ethics might be related must a Darwinian be sceptical about religion? how different are humans from other animals? morality without the idea that humans are
...
...