Conference reviewing considered harmful


This paper develops a model of computer systems research to help prospective authors understand the often obscure workings of conference program committees. We present data to show that the variability between reviewers is often the dominant factor as to whether a paper is accepted. We argue that paper merit is likely to be zipf distributed, making it… (More)
DOI: 10.1145/1531793.1531815


4 Figures and Tables

Slides referencing similar topics