Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses

  title={Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses},
  author={Martina K. Linnenluecke and Mauricio Marrone and Abhay K. Singh},
  journal={Australian Journal of Management},
  pages={175 - 194}
Literature reviews play an essential role in academic research to gather existing knowledge and to examine the state of a field. However, researchers in business, management and related disciplines continue to rely on cursory and narrative reviews that lack a systematic investigation of the literature. This article details methodological steps for conducting literature reviews in a replicable and scientific fashion. This article also discusses bibliographic mapping approaches to visualise… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Publishing literature reviews

Purpose The author discusses his views on writing good, structured literature reviews (SLRs), meta-analyses and bibliometric articles with the aim of encouraging the audience to engage with this

Methodology of Writing Literature Review on Management and Business: Digest of Overseas Highly-Cited Articles

  • I. Denisov
  • Psychology
    Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
  • 2021
The goal of the research is to elaborate methodology how to systematize findings in the field of management published during previous years. Special attention is paid to typology of reviews. In this

Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research

This article offers a critical review of systematic literature reviews published in the Academy of Management Annals and the International Journal of Management Reviews between 2004 and 2018 and identifies several descriptive features such as the mean number of research items included in systematic reviews, themean number of databases used, and the mean coverage period of such reviews.

Systematic Literature Review: Bibliometric Analysis of Green Consumer Behavior

This study aims to use bibliometric analysis to provide a systematic overview of the green consumer behaviors research from publication on Scopus from 2010 to 2021. As a result, 926 papers were

A bibliometric analysis and future research opportunities in Multinational Business Review

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the past contributions of Multinational Business Review (MBR), identify research gaps and opportunities and provide a research agenda that addresses several

Institutions and Firms' Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Avenues

International business scholars have recognized the importance of the contextual embeddedness of firms. However, how they matter remains a contested question. Although recent efforts have been made

Global trends in board diversity research: a bibliometric view

Purpose This study aims to identify the main research development on board diversity and offers a quantitative synopsis of key themes and contributors, knowledge gaps and provides directions for

The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science

Abstract Purpose The proliferation of knowledge in management sciences is accelerating rapidly. The condition of reliability and originality of research underlies all research activities. Therefore,

Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis

The rapid expansion of the eSports industry has attracted scholars’ attention in recent years. However, little research has investigated the evolution of the extant eSports literature. This study



Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool

Reviews of existing research evidence have the potential to inform both practice and scholarship. This opportunity is currently not being fully realized in management and organization studies due to

Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies

This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence-based management.

Writing Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions

Most of the articles that appear in Journal of Management (JOM) are empirical. Generally, these report original data collected from one or more samples and deployed to test a social scientific theory

Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

The extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research is evaluated.

Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews

Systematic literature reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets.

revtools: bibliographic data visualization for evidence synthesis in R

‘revtools’, an R package for exploratory investigation of bibliographic data during reviews and evidence syntheses, provides tools for the import and de-duplication of biblographic data formats, and cluster analysis and visualization of article titles, abstracts and keywords using topics models.

Relevant Research Areas in IT Service Management: An Examination of Academic and Practitioner Literatures

The results suggest that the topics of framework co-implementation, regulations, ITSM tools, gamification, and cloud computing all present fertile grounds for relevant research in ITSM and IS more broadly.

Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis

  • A. Akobeng
  • Psychology
    Archives of Disease in Childhood
  • 2005
Important issues that need to be considered when appraising a systematic review or meta-analysis are outlined, and some of the terms used in the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses—such as odds ratio, relative risk, confidence interval, and the forest plot are introduced.