Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

@article{Viechtbauer2010ConductingMI,
  title={Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package},
  author={Wolfgang Viechtbauer},
  journal={Journal of Statistical Software},
  year={2010},
  volume={36},
  pages={1-48}
}
  • W. Viechtbauer
  • Published 5 August 2010
  • Mathematics
  • Journal of Statistical Software
The metafor package provides functions for conducting meta-analyses in R. The package includes functions for fitting the meta-analytic fixed- and random-effects models and allows for the inclusion of moderators variables (study-level covariates) in these models. Meta-regression analyses with continuous and categorical moderators can be conducted in this way. Functions for the Mantel-Haenszel and Peto's one-step method for meta-analyses of 2 x 2 table data are also available. Finally, the… 

metaSEM: an R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling

This paper provides a summary on how meta-analyses can be formulated as structural equation models and concludes with a conclusion on several relevant topics to this SEM-based meta-analysis.

metaplus: An R Package for the Analysis of Robust Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

The metaplus package is described with examples of its use for fitting meta-analysis and meta-regression andPlots allow the results of the different models to be compared and the presence of outliers to be tested using the parametric bootstrap.

Multiple moderator meta-analysis using the R-package Meta-CART

The R-package metacart is described, which provides user-friendly functions to conduct meta-CART analyses in R and can fit both fixed- and random-effects meta- CART, and can handle dichotomous, categorical, ordinal and continuous moderators.

A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R

A brief contrast of the strengths of each is described for the synthesis scientist, with meta is a direct, intuitive choice for rapid implementation of general meta-analytical statistics and metafor has a steeper learning curve but greater rewards.

Maximum-likelihood methods for meta-analysis: A tutorial using R

The method of maximum likelihood provides a versatile way to estimate and conduct inference about moderators of effect size in meta-analytic models. The metafor package for the open-source

Statistical Packages for Diagnostic Meta-Analysis and Their Application

This chapter reviews existing software and discusses the relative merits of general packages and specialized packages for DTA meta-analysis, as well as ways to extend the bivariate model and software for the case of multiple cutoff values per primary study.

An extended mixed‐effects framework for meta‐analysis

A general framework for meta-analysis based on linear mixed-effects models, where potentially complex patterns of effect sizes are modeled through an extended and flexible structure of fixed and random terms is illustrated.

Meta-analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models

In prevention science and related fields, large meta-analyses are common, and these analyses often involve dependent effect size estimates. Robust variance estimation (RVE) methods provide a way to

A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta‐analyses in R

Abstract There is extensive choice in R to support meta‐analyses. Two packages in this ecosystem include meta and metafor and provide an excellent opportunity to apply a structured checklist

Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling with Moderating Effects on SEM Parameters

Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) is an increasingly popular meta-analytic technique that combines the strengths of meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. MASEM facilitates
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 87 REFERENCES

A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

The random-effects regression method performs well in the context of a meta-analysis of the efficacy of a vaccine for the prevention of tuberculosis, where certain factors are thought to modify vaccine efficacy.

Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.

There are 2 families of statistical procedures in meta-analysis: fixed- and randomeffects procedures. They were developed for somewhat different inference goals: making inferences about the effect

Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

These are simple rank-based data augmentation techniques, which formalize the use of funnel plots, which provide effective and relatively powerful tests for evaluating the existence of publication bias.

Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model

The meta-analytic random effects model assumes that the variability in effect size estimates drawn from a set of studies can be decomposed into two parts: heterogeneity due to random population

Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

An adjusted rank correlation test is proposed as a technique for identifying publication bias in a meta-analysis, and its operating characteristics are evaluated via simulations. The test statistic

A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

Abstract Meta-analysis collects and synthesizes results from individual studies to estimate an overall effect size. If published studies are chosen, say through a literature review, then an inherent

Empirical Bayes Meta-Analysis

As interest in quantitative research synthesis grows, investigators increasingly seek to use information about study features—study contexts, designs, treatments, and subjects—to account for

Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression

This tutorial on advanced statistical methods for meta‐analysis can be seen as a sequel to the recent Tutorial in Biostatistics on meta‐analysis by Normand, which focused on elementary methods.

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study

Regression-based adjustments for publication bias and other small study effects are easy to conduct and outperformed more established methods over a wide range of simulation scenarios.

Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate

This work examines the commonly used tests on the parameters in the random effects meta-regression with one covariate and proposes some new test statistics based on an improved estimator of the variance of the parameter estimates based on some theoretical considerations.
...