Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game

@article{Piazza2008ConcernsAR,
  title={Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game},
  author={Jared Piazza and Jesse M. Bering},
  journal={Evolution and Human Behavior},
  year={2008},
  volume={29},
  pages={172-178}
}
In the present study, a modified dictator game was used to test the hypothesis that the threat of gossip would encourage prosocial decision making. All participants were asked to distribute an endowment between themselves and an anonymous second party. Half of the participants were told that the second party would be discussing their economic decision with a third party. For some participants, this third party was someone to whom they had first disclosed personally identifying information… 

Tables from this paper

Social Influence on Third-Party Punishment: An Experiment
We study the effect of social influence on agents’ decisions to engage in costly decentralized third-party punishment. In a laboratory experiment, participants play a modified Dictator game with
The effects of celebrity gossip on trust are moderated by prosociality of the gossipers
Abstract Previous research suggests that gossip serves several functions in regulating group dynamics (e.g. bonding, entertainment) and is preferentially used by prosocial individuals to protect the
Gossip in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: Its Immediate and Downstream Consequences for Cooperation
TLDR
The findings imply that gossip invariably promotes cooperation across strategic and non-strategic situations, but the potential rejection by one’s partner weakly promotes cooperation, and even undermines future cooperation especially when paired with reputation sharing opportunities.
Gossip and competitive altruism support cooperation in a Public Good game
TLDR
This study fills a theoretical and empirical gap by showing that partner choice increases both cooperation and honesty of gossip.
Gossip and Ostracism Promote Cooperation in Groups
TLDR
Results suggest that the spread of reputational information through gossip can mitigate egoistic behavior by facilitating partner selection, thereby helping to solve the problem of cooperation even in noniterated interactions.
Social Influence on Third-Party Punishment: An Experiment
In this paper, we study the effects of social influence on third-parties' decisions whether to engage in costly, decentralized punishment. We elicit punishment decisions both in isolation and after
Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity
Abstract We advance a framework for understanding why and how gossip may promote generosity and cooperation, especially in situations that can result in greater indirect benefits from others. Drawing
When Strangers Start to Gossip: Investigating the Effect of Gossip on Cooperation in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
Previous research indicates gossip is a social bonding system that is use to establish shared acquaintances and/or attitudes, to punish group norm violators, or for coercion via invoking fear of
Gossip Versus Punishment: The Efficiency of Reputation to Promote and Maintain Cooperation
TLDR
Some initial evidence that gossip may be more effective and efficient than punishment to promote and maintain cooperation is provided.
When Does Gossip Promote Generosity? Indirect Reciprocity Under the Shadow of the Future
Reputation through gossip is a key mechanism promoting cooperation. The present research proposes that gossip promotes cooperation when one anticipates future interdependence with the gossip
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games
Research on ultimatum and dictator games has found that because of "fairness" first movers in such games offer more than noncooperative game theory predicts. We find that if the right to be the first
Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
We conduct double-anonymous dictator experiments to explore the role of altruism in motivating subjects’ behavior. We vary the extent to which an anonymous recipient is deserving of aid and
Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games
A surprisingly large amount of otherregarding behavior is the common finding of experiments on bargaining, public goods, and trust. Elizabeth Hoffman et al. ( hereafter, HMS ) ( 1996 ) have provided
Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining
Abstract Previous investigations have shown that laboratory play of the ultimatum game differs from the perfect equilibrium prediction. The anonymity hypothesis attributes this to a distortion of
Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’
TLDR
It is shown, through alternating rounds of public goods and indirect reciprocity games, that the need to maintain reputation for indirect reciprocities maintains contributions to the public good at an unexpectedly high level, but if rounds of indirect reciprocation are not expected, then contributions toThe public good drop quickly to zero.
Cooperation through image scoring in humans.
TLDR
It is shown that image scoring promotes cooperative behavior in situations where direct reciprocity is unlikely, unless indirect reciprocity takes place and is based on image scoring, as recently shown by game theorists.
Third Party Punishment and Social Norms
We examine the characteristics and relative strength of third-party sanctions in a series of experiments. We hypothesize that egalitarian distribution norms and cooperation norms apply in our
Are Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments
Research in social sciences other than economics indicates substantial differences in behavior between men and women. The general conclusion drawn from this work is that women will be more
Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics
The advantages and disadvantages of expanding the standard economic model by more realistic behavioral assumptions have received much attention. The issue raised in this article is whether it is
Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans
TLDR
This work shows that people actively compete to be more generous than others when they can benefit from being chosen for cooperative partnerships, and the most generous people are correspondingly chosen more often as cooperative partners.
...
1
2
3
...