• Corpus ID: 240420091

Computing with R-INLA: Accuracy and reproducibility with implications for the analysis of COVID-19 data

  title={Computing with R-INLA: Accuracy and reproducibility with implications for the analysis of COVID-19 data},
  author={Kori Khan and Hengrui Luo and Wenna Xi},
The statistical methods used to analyze medical data are becoming increasingly complex. Novel statistical methods increasingly rely on simulation studies to assess their validity. Such assessments typically appear in statistical or computational journals, and the methodology is later introduced to the medical community through tutorials. This can be problematic if applied researchers use the methodologies in settings that have not been evaluated. In this paper, we explore a case study of one… 

Figures and Tables from this paper


Sensitivity analysis for Bayesian hierarchical models
This work proposes a novel formal approach to prior sensitivity analysis which quantifies sensitivity without the need for a model re-run, and develops a ready-to-use priorSens package in R which can be used to detect high prior sensitivities of some parameters as well as identifiability issues in possibly over-parametrized Bayesian hierarchical models.
Reproducible Research: A Retrospective.
The origins of reproducible research are discussed, the current status of reproducibility in public health research is characterized, and Reproducibility to current concerns about replicability of scientific findings are connected.
Reproducible epidemiologic research.
A standard for reproducibility is outlined and methods for reproducible research are proposed and implemented by use of a case study in air pollution and health.
Posterior and Cross-validatory Predictive Checks: A Comparison of MCMC and INLA
Two approaches for estimating Bayesian hierarchical models are compared: Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) and how both approaches allow for the computation of leave-one-out cross-validatory checks without re-running the model for each observation in turn.
Spatial and spatio-temporal models with R-INLA.
A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping
A comprehensive review of the main classes of such models that have been used for disease mapping within a Bayesian estimation paradigm, and a performance comparison between representative models in these classes are reported, using a set of simulated data to help illustrate their respective properties.
Spatio‐temporal disease mapping using INLA
This paper describes how several parametric and nonparametric models and extensions thereof can be fitted to space–time count data using INLA and particular emphasis is given to the appropriate choice of linear constraints to ensure identifiability of the parameter estimates.
Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
The posterior mean deviance is suggested as a Bayesian measure of fit or adequacy, and the contributions of individual observations to the fit and complexity can give rise to a diagnostic plot of deviance residuals against leverages.