Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy?

@article{Kuflik2004ComputersIC,
  title={Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy?},
  author={Arthur Kuflik},
  journal={Ethics and Information Technology},
  year={2004},
  volume={1},
  pages={173-184}
}
  • A. Kuflik
  • Published 31 January 1998
  • Education
  • Ethics and Information Technology
To what extent should humans transfer, or abdicate, “responsibility” to computers? In this paper, I distinguish six different senses of ‘responsible’ and then consider in which of these senses computers can, and in which they cannot, be said to be “responsible” for “deciding” various outcomes. I sort out and explore two different kinds of complaint against putting computers in greater “control” of our lives: (i) as finite and fallible human beings, there is a limit to how far we can acheive… 
Computing and moral responsibility
Traditionally philosophical discussions on moral responsibility have focused on the human components in moral action. Accounts of how to ascribe moral responsibility usually describe human agents
Refining the ethics of computer-made decisions: a classification of moral mediation by ubiquitous machines
TLDR
It is argued that modern machines do not only have morality in the sense of mediating the actions of humans, but that, by making their own decisions within their relations with humans, mediate morality itself.
Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account
TLDR
The foundation of a philosophical account of meaningful human control is laid, based on the concept of “guidance control” as elaborated in the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility, in the form of design requirements for non-military autonomous systems, for instance, self-driving cars.
Android arete: Toward a virtue ethic for computational agents
  • K. Coleman
  • Philosophy
    Ethics and Information Technology
  • 2004
TLDR
It is argued that by providing a framework for identifying and critiquing assumptions about what a `good' computer is, a study of android arete provides focus and direction to the development of future computational agents.
Imitation games: Turing, Menard, Van Meegeren
For many, the very idea of an artificialintelligence has always been ethicallytroublesome. The putative ability of machinesto mimic human intelligence appears to callinto question the stability of
Artificial Agents - Personhood in Law and Philosophy
TLDR
It is not necessary or desirable to postulate artificial agents as legal persons in order to account for the doctrinal difficulties presented by the contracts entered into by artificial agents, and the validity of attributes suggested as pointers of person-hood are investigated.
“Ain’t No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers
TLDR
In this paper, seven arguments for that claim that certain technologies make it impossible to attribute responsibility to engineers (or anyone else) are identified and explained and why each is fallacious.
The Social Robot as 'Charismatic Leader': A Phenomenology of Human Submission to Nonhuman Power
TLDR
It is argued that charismatic robot leaders will emerge naturally from the authors' world’s social fabric, without any rational decision on their part, and the stability of these leader-follower relations will hinge on a fundamental, unresolved question of robotic intelligence.
Agents with a human touch : modeling of human rationality in agent systems
TLDR
A decision-making methodology is introduced to address the different characteristics that an agent should have in order to be better trusted with such critical decisions in critical or sensitive situations.
Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility - Autonomy Trust and Responsibility
TLDR
It is argued that for people to trust autonomous robots to be able to explain the reasons for their decisions, they need to know which ethical principles they are applying and that their application is deterministic and predictable.
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
Leveson,Safeware: System Safety and Computers(Reading
  • Mass.: Addison-Wesley,
  • 1995
THE RISKS OF SOFTWARE
Department of Statistics and Computational Mathematics at Liverpool University, “an authority on software reliability
  • as quoted inThe Washington Post , April
  • 1989
Praxis Systems, which produces special high reliability software for Britain’s Air Force, quoted in “Is America Ready to ‘Fly by Wire’?”,The Washington Post
  • 1989