Computer-Animated Displays and the Jury: Facilitative and Prejudicial Effects

@article{Kassin1997ComputerAnimatedDA,
  title={Computer-Animated Displays and the Jury: Facilitative and Prejudicial Effects},
  author={Saul M. Kassin and Meghan A. Dunn},
  journal={Law and Human Behavior},
  year={1997},
  volume={21},
  pages={269-281}
}
Two experiments assessed the effects of computer-animated displays on mock jurors. In both, participants watched a trial involving a dispute over whether a man who fell to his death had accidentally slipped or jumped in a suicide. They watched a proplaintiff or prodefendant version in which the body landed 5–10 feet or 20–25 feet from the building. Within each condition, the distance testimony was presented orally or with an animated display. When the tape depicted the event in a neutral manner… 
Order Effects in Animated Sequences of Computer-Generated Evidence (CGE)
Order effects have been experimentally demonstrated to exert influence on judgements, dependent upon where the most salient pieces of information are presented in the sequence, either first (primacy)
Can fabricated evidence induce false eyewitness testimony
False information can influence people's beliefs and memories. But can fabricated evidence induce individuals to accuse another person of doing something they never did? We examined whether exposure
Innocent But Proven Guilty: Eliciting Internalized False Confessions Using Doctored-Video Evidence
More powerful computers and affordable digital-video equipment means that desktop-video editing is now accessible and popular. In two experiments, we investigated whether seeing fake-video evidence,
The Jury Persuaded (and Not): Computer Animation in the Courtroom
In two experiments, we examined the persuasiveness of computer animation on juror decision making by comparing animation to diagrams in two mock trials - a plane crash case and a car accident case.
Enhanced Persuasion in the Courtroom: Visually Dynamic Demonstrative Evidence and Juror Decision Making
Trial lawyers may benefit from the use of visually dynamic media to persuade jurors of their case. While this approach is not new, advances in computer technology have changed the methods available
The Propensity Effect
TLDR
Findings revealed that the hindsight bias was more than doubled when computer animations, rather than text-plus-diagram descriptions, were used; these results have important legal implications.
Too Real? The Future of Virtual Reality Evidence
Immersive virtual environments (IVEs), or virtual reality, could soon follow other visual technologies from the culture at large to the courtroom. The unprecedented realism of IVEs may be thought to
Computer Animation of Traffic Accidents: Hindsight Bias and Judgments of Blame
Computer animation that vividly portrays traffic accidents are increasingly used as analytical and persuasive tools in the American tort system. As this technology continues to develop and its costs
Surprise influences hindsight–foresight differences in temporal judgments of animated automobile accidents
TLDR
The role of an outcome’s initial surprise in the hindsight bias was examined using animations of automobile accidents, and the results are consistent with a sense-making model of hindsight bias.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
The Direct and Indirect Effects of Inadmissible Evidence1
College students (N= 270) assigned to six-person mock juries read summaries of a murder trial and then evaluated the defendant's guilt both before and after group discussion. The strength of the
Blood and Guts: General and Trial-Specific Effects of Videotaped Crime Scenes on Mock Jurors
A mock jury study was conducted to evaluate the effects of videotaped crime scenes on juries. Forty-eight subjects took the Juror Bias Scale and read a murder trial transcript. In addition, subjects
Vivid persuasion in the courtroom.
TLDR
Three categories of variables (inferential, attentional/memorial, and affective) are elucidated that are likely to mediate the effects of the vividness of testimony on jury judgments and are used to explain discrepant findings among mock juror experiments investigating vividness effects.
Mock Jurors Versus Mock Juries: The Role of Deliberations in Reactions to Inadmissible Testimony
The consensus among authors in the area of juridic decision making is that trial jurors often readily disregard judicial instructions to ignore inadmissible evidence. Perhaps, however, the moderating
Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.
This study investigates the role of representation of evidence in a juror's decision process. A model is presented that includes an initial stage of processing in which cognitive representations of
Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias
Although past research has established pretrial publicity's potential to bias juror judgment, there has been less attention given to the effectiveness of judicial remedies for combatting such biases.
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.
This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories
First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials
This study examines the proposition that first ballots predict jury verdicts inaactual juries, an oft-cited finding from Kalven and Zeisel, and the explicit assumption by Kalven and Zeisel that
Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments.
People often draw social inferences and render social judgments on the basis of relevant information they can recall from memory. Having known John for many years, we may unexpectedly be asked by an
Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin.
TLDR
It is suggested that objects dropped from a moving carrier may be perceived as falling straight down or even backward, when in fact they move forward as they fall.
...
...