Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature

  title={Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature},
  author={Taiwo Akhigbe and Adalan Zolnourian and Diederik O. Bulters},
  journal={Journal of Clinical Neuroscience},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews.
It is demonstrated that the search strategies used in neurosurgical SRs require improvement and it is proposed that this be achieved by the incorporation of PRISMA and other guidelines into article submission and peer-review processes.
Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study.
It is demonstrated that the overall reporting quality of abstracts in leading neurosurgical journals requires improvement and attention should be turned toward strengthening abstract submission and peer-review processes.
Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines
The overall reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions to improve vaccination coverage requires significant improvement and there remains a need for additional research targeted at addressing potential barriers to compliance and strategies to improve compliance with PRISMA guideline.
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
The pooled results of these studies suggest that reporting of many items in the PRISMA Statement is suboptimal, even in the 2382 SRs published after 2009, where nine items were adhered to by fewer than 67% of SRs.
Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Coiling was significantly associated with a better life quality, a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of mortality, rebleeding, hydrocephalous, and a lower rate of complete occlusion than clipping.
Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusions in revision total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Use of intravenous TXA for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty may reduce hemoglobin reduction, number of red blood cell units transfused and blood transfusion rate without increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism and length of operation duration.
Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
If a shared model of the literature searching process can be detected across systematic review guidance documents and, if so, how this process is reported in the guidance and supported by published studies is determined.


Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature.
Reporting and methodology of meta-analyses in the neurosurgery literature is excessively variable and overall poor and journals need to adopt a clear definition of a meta-analysis and insist that they be created using checklists for both reporting and methodology.
A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
The quality of reporting assessed using PRISma guidelines was significantly better in orthodontic SRs published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the association between AMSTAR score and modified PRISMA score was found to be highly statistically significant.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.
  • K. Knobloch, U. Yoon, P. Vogt
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
  • 2011
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
The updating of the QUOROM Statement is described, to ensure clear presentation of what was planned, done, and found in a systematic review, and the name of the reporting guidance was changed to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses).
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
There were large differences between Cochrane reviews and non-Cochrane reviews in the quality of reporting several characteristics, and the view that readers should not accept SRs uncritically is substantiated.
Medical vs invasive therapy in AVM-related epilepsy
There is insufficient evidence available to determine if invasive AVM management is superior to AED only for controlling seizures, and an RCT of interventional vs medical management using standardized epilepsy-specific presurgical protocols is warranted.
Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement
This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
Stereotactic radiosurgery with and without embolization for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Embolization before SRS significantly decreases the AVM obliteration rate, however, there is no significant difference in the risk of hemorrhage and permanent neurological deficits after SRS alone and following embolization.