Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.

@article{Hall2002ComparisonOT,
  title={Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.},
  author={Steven M Hall and Michael T. Brannick},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  year={2002},
  volume={87 2},
  pages={377-89}
}
Two studies compared the Schmidt-Hunter method of meta-analysis (J. E. Hunter & F. L. Schmidt, 1990) with the method described by L. V. Hedges and J. L. Vevea (1998). Study 1 evaluated estimates of rho, sigmarho, and resulting credibility intervals for both models through Monte Carlo methods. Results showed slight differences between the 2 methods. In Study 2, a reanalysis of published meta-analyses using both methods with several artifact distributions showed that although both choice of… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
19 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 19 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…