Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes

@inproceedings{Riding2015ComparisonOT,
  title={Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes},
  author={Nathan R Riding and Nabeel Sheikh and Carmen Adamuz and Victoria Watt and Abdulaziz Farooq and Gregory P. Whyte and Keith P. George and Jonathan Adam Drezner and Sanjay Sharma and Mathew G. Wilson},
  booktitle={Heart},
  year={2015}
}
BACKGROUND An increasing number of sporting bodies report unacceptably high levels of false-positive ECGs when undertaking pre-participation cardiac screening. To address this issue, modified ECG interpretation criteria have become available for use within athletes. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the accuracy of the new 2014 'Refined Criteria' against the 2013 Seattle Criteria and the 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations in a cohort of Arabic, black and Caucasian athletes… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 68 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 29 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 references

Clinical significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: comparison with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension

  • A Zaidi
  • Eur Heart J,
  • 2013

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…