Comparison of the safety and feasibility of arrhythmia ablation using the Amigo Robotic Remote Catheter System versus manual ablation.

@article{Datino2014ComparisonOT,
  title={Comparison of the safety and feasibility of arrhythmia ablation using the Amigo Robotic Remote Catheter System versus manual ablation.},
  author={Tom{\'a}s Datino and Angel Arenal and Mauricio Pelliza and Jes{\'u}s M Hern{\'a}ndez-Hern{\'a}ndez and Felipe Atienza and Esteban Gonz{\'a}lez-Torrecilla and Pablo Justo Avila and Loreto Bravo and Francisco Fernandez-Aviles},
  journal={The American journal of cardiology},
  year={2014},
  volume={113 5},
  pages={827-31}
}
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the Amigo Remote Catheter System (RCS) in arrhythmia ablation procedures. Because Amigo allows the physician to operate all catheter function outside of the radiation field, operator exposure time was also evaluated. This is a nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial conducted at 1 site (identifier: NCT01834872). The study prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive patients (mean age 59 ± 15 years, 72% men) with any type of… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
5 Extracted Citations
16 Extracted References
Similar Papers

Referenced Papers

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 16 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…