Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics.

@article{Cipriani2003ComparisonOS,
  title={Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics.},
  author={Andrea Cipriani and John Geddes},
  journal={Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale},
  year={2003},
  volume={12 3},
  pages={146-53}
}
Making rapid decisions is a key component of everyday clinical practice. Informed decision making requires physicians to combine their own clinical expertise and training with high quality scientific evidence. New scientific knowledge is emerging all the time and all health workers need to update their knowledge continuously. Most busy practising clinicians simply do not have sufficient time to read all the important primary research reports. Over two million articles are published every year… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 17 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…