Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

@article{Sung2007ComparisonOR,
  title={Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.},
  author={Vivian W. Sung and Mark D. Schleinitz and Charles R. Rardin and Ren{\'e}e Melva Ward and Deborah L. Myers},
  journal={American journal of obstetrics and gynecology},
  year={2007},
  volume={197 1},
  pages={3-11}
}
To systematically review the literature and to quantitatively compare outcomes and complications following retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings. We searched PUBMED, OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, POPLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration resources, TRIP, Global Health databases, and abstracts from relevant meetings from 1990 to 2006. We included all studies that compared retropubic and transobturator approaches to midurethral slings and that defined outcomes. We used random… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
62 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 62 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…