Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

@article{Loughead2005ComparisonOO,
  title={Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.},
  author={Jonathan M. Loughead and D. Chesney and James Patrick Holland and Andrew McCaskie},
  journal={The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume},
  year={2005},
  volume={87 2},
  pages={
          163-6
        }
}
Hip resurfacing is being performed more frequently in the United Kingdom. The possible benefits include more accurate restoration of leg length, femoral offset and femoral anteversion than occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared anteroposterior radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone hybrid THA (uncemented cup/cemented stem), with 28 who had undergone Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty (BHR). We measured the femoral offset, femoral length, acetabular offset and… CONTINUE READING

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 CITATIONS, ESTIMATED 45% COVERAGE

Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with Navigation

  • Clinical orthopaedics and related research
  • 2011
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2006
2018

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 1 Highly Influenced Citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES

Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple

KA De Smet, C Pattyn, R. Verdonk
  • Hip
  • 2002

NICE recommends the selective use of metal on metal hip resurfacing

KA DeSmet, C Pattyn, R Verdonk
  • 2002