Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

@article{Eastwood2009ComparisonON,
  title={Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.},
  author={Kerrie Eastwood and Patrick Else and Andre Charlett and Mark R. Wilcox},
  journal={Journal of clinical microbiology},
  year={2009},
  volume={47 10},
  pages={
          3211-7
        }
}
The continuing rise in the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection is a cause for concern, with implications for patients and health care systems. Laboratory diagnosis largely relies on rapid toxin detection kits, although assays detecting alternative targets, including glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin genes, are now available. Six hundred routine diagnostic diarrheal samples were tested prospectively using nine commercial toxin detection assays, cytotoxin assay (CYT), and… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 141 CITATIONS

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2010
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 22 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 12 Citations per year over the last 3 years

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…