Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.

@article{Kong2014ComparisonOL,
  title={Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.},
  author={Tae Wook Kong and Suk Joon Chang and Jisun Lee and Jiheum Paek and Hee Sug Ryu},
  journal={International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society},
  year={2014},
  volume={24 2},
  pages={280-8}
}
OBJECTIVE There have been many comparative reports on laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for early-stage cervical cancer. However, most of these studies included patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA2 and small (tumor diameter ≤2 or 3 cm) IB1 disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, and recurrence rate of LRH and ARH for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 4 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
12 Citations
25 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…