Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.

@article{Shao2011ComparisonOH,
  title={Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.},
  author={Jiahui Shao and J. -W. Hou and Hongchen Song},
  journal={Water research},
  year={2011},
  volume={45 2},
  pages={473-82}
}
Increasingly stringent regulations for drinking water quality have stimulated the ultrafiltration (UF) to become one of the best alternatives replacing conventional drinking water treatment technologies. However, UF is not very effectively to remove humic acid due to the comparatively larger pore size compared to the size of humic acid. Fouling issue is another factor that restricts its widespread application. In this study, rejection of humic acid and flux decline were compared with… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 13 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 18 references

Development of a novel electrophoresisUV grafting technique to modify PES UF membranes used for NOM removal

H. Yamamura, S. Chae, K. Kimura, Y. Watanabe
J . Membr . Sci . • 2006

A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recoverybybackwashing : experimentsandmodeling

K. Katsoufidou, S. G. Yiantsios, A. J. Karabelas
J . Membr . Sci . • 2005
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…