Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Abstract

The stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is primarily determined by a plain abdominal radiograph alone. However, the accuracy of that assessment can be challenged by renal tomography and flexible nephroscopy. We report on 29 patients with large renal calculi treated with a combination of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ESWL. Stone-free rates were determined by plain abdominal radiograph, renal tomography and flexible nephroscopy. The plain abdominal radiograph and renal tomography overestimated stone-free rates by 35% and 17%, respectively, compared to flexible nephroscopy. To determine stone-free rates after ESWL renal tomography is superior to a plain abdominal radiograph alone. Also, among patients with large renal calculi the use of the flexible nephroscope markedly improves the stone-free rate.

0100200300'95'98'01'04'07'10'13'16
Citations per Year

914 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 914 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Denstedt1991ComparisonOE, title={Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.}, author={John D. Denstedt and Ralph Victor Clayman and Daniel Picus}, journal={The Journal of urology}, year={1991}, volume={145 4}, pages={703-5} }