Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA® and SLActive® implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study.

@article{Alayan2017ComparisonOE,
  title={Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA® and SLActive® implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study.},
  author={Jamil Alayan and C{\'e}dryck Vaquette and Siamak Saifzadeh and Dietmar Werner Hutmacher and Saso Ivanovski},
  journal={Clinical oral implants research},
  year={2017},
  volume={28 11},
  pages={
          1325-1333
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of a hydrophilic implant surface (SLActive® ) placed into augmented maxillary sinuses on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and surrounding tissue composition when compared to a hydrophobic surface (SLA® ). MATERIAL AND METHODS Four sheep underwent bilateral sinus augmentation. Each sinus received anorganic bovine bone mineral + autogenous bone (ABBM + AB). Sixteen implants were subsequently placed 12 weeks postgrafting with each sinus receiving a control (SLA® ) and… CONTINUE READING
1 Citations
51 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 51 references

parison of sla ( r ) or slactive ( r ) implants placed in the maxillary sinus with or without synthetic bone graft materials – an animal study in sheep

  • F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, N. Olshanska, M. de Wild, M. Wieland, J. Geis-Gerstorfer
  • Clinical Oral Implants Research
  • 2014

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…