Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare the performance of radiologists in the use of conventional ultrasound (US) and automated breast volume ultrasound (ABVU) for the characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses based on breast imaging and reporting data system (BI-RADS) criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Conventional US and ABVU images were obtained in 87 patients with 106 solid breast masses (52 cancers, 54 benign lesions). Three experienced radiologists who were blinded to all examination results independently characterized the lesions and reported a BI-RADS assessment category and a level of suspicion of malignancy. The results were analyzed by calculation of Cohen's κ coefficient and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS Assessment of the agreement of conventional US and ABVU indicated that the posterior echo feature was the most discordant feature of seven features (κ = 0.371 ± 0.225) and that orientation had the greatest agreement (κ = 0.608 ± 0.210). The final assessment showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.773 ± 0.104). The areas under the ROC curves (Az) for conventional US and ABVU were not statistically significant for each reader, but the mean Az values of conventional US and ABVU by multi-reader multi-case analysis were significantly different (conventional US 0.991, ABVU 0.963; 95 % CI -0.0471 to -0.0097). The means for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of conventional US and ABVU did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION There was substantial inter-observer agreement in the final assessment of solid breast masses by conventional US and ABVU. ROC analysis comparing the performance of conventional US and ABVU indicated a marginally significant difference in mean Az, but not in mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value.

DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0419-1
01000200020132014201520162017
Citations per Year

1,341 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,341 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Kim2014ComparisonOC, title={Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.}, author={Hyunji Kim and Joo Hee Cha and Ha-Yeun Oh and Hak Hee Kim and Hee Jung Shin and Eun Young Chae}, journal={Breast cancer}, year={2014}, volume={21 4}, pages={423-8} }