[Comparison of anti-proliferation effects of two IFNs on Tca8113, ACC-M in vitro].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Comparison of anti-proliferation and anti tumor specificity of two IFNs on Tca8113, ACC-M in Vitro. METHODS MTT assay and HTCA were performed to determine direct anti-proliferation effects of two IFNs on Tca8113, ACC-M and L929 cells, respectively. RESULTS When Tca8113 cells were treated with 1000U/ml alpha-IFN, gamma-IFN, respectively, cell proliferation inhabition rate was (45.4+/-4.1)% by gamma-IFN, (45.9+/-5.4)% by gamma-IFN; inhibition rate of colony formation was (52.0+/-2.9)% by alpha-IFN, (54.6+/-4.1)% by gamma-IFN; and ACC-M cell proliferation inhibition rate was (23.1+/-2.1)% by alpha-IFN,(26.5+/-1.3)% by gamma-IFN; inhibition rate of colony formation was (23.1+/-2.1)% by alpha-IFN, (26.5+/-1.3)% by gamma-IFN; inhibition rate of colony formation was (26.2+/-2.0)% by alpha-IFN, (27.3+/-1.8)% by gamma-IFN. There was no significant difference between two IFNs (P>0.05). When L929 cells were treated with 1000U/ml alpha-IFN, gamma-IFN,respectively, cell proliferation inhibition rate was (3.9+/-1.1)% by alpha IFN, (4.1+/-0.7)% by gamma-IFN; There was significant difference in antiproliferation on Tca8113 cells and L929 cells (P<0.01). CONCLUSION Both alpha-IFN and gamma-IFN have better direct anti-cancer effect on tongue squamous cell cancer and anti-tumor specificity. But anti-proliferation effect of two IFNs on ACC-M cells was not obvious.

Cite this paper

@article{Lin2001ComparisonOA, title={[Comparison of anti-proliferation effects of two IFNs on Tca8113, ACC-M in vitro].}, author={L S Lin and G C Lin and Wei Ting Chen and X J Zhou}, journal={Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology}, year={2001}, volume={10 2}, pages={112-5} }