Comparison of anesthetic efficacy and adverse effects associated with peribulbar injection of ropivacaine performed with and without ultrasound guidance in dogs.

@article{Wagatsuma2014ComparisonOA,
  title={Comparison of anesthetic efficacy and adverse effects associated with peribulbar injection of ropivacaine performed with and without ultrasound guidance in dogs.},
  author={Juliana Tess{\'a}lia Wagatsuma and Maur{\'i}cio Deschk and Beatriz P Floriano and Joana Z Ferreira and Heitor Fioravanti and Isabela F Gasparello and Val{\'e}ria N L S Oliva},
  journal={American journal of veterinary research},
  year={2014},
  volume={75 12},
  pages={1040-8}
}
OBJECTIVE To compare the anesthetic efficacy and adverse effects associated with peribulbar injection of ropivacaine (1% solution) performed with and without ultrasound guidance (UG) in dogs. ANIMALS 15 dogs without ophthalmologic abnormalities. PROCEDURES Each dog was sedated and anesthetized. A peribulbar injection of ropivacaine (1% solution; 0.3 mL/kg) was performed with UG in 1 eye and without UG in the contralateral eye (control). For each eye, the intraocular pressure (IOP… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS