Comparison of air-agitated liquid-liquid microextraction technique and conventional dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction for determination of triazole pesticides in aqueous samples by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection.

@article{Farajzadeh2013ComparisonOA,
  title={Comparison of air-agitated liquid-liquid microextraction technique and conventional dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction for determination of triazole pesticides in aqueous samples by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection.},
  author={Mir Ali Farajzadeh and Mohammad Reza Afshar Mogaddam and Abdollah Abdollahi Aghdam},
  journal={Journal of chromatography. A},
  year={2013},
  volume={1300},
  pages={70-8}
}
Two micro-extraction methods, air-agitated liquid-liquid microextraction (AALLME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), have been compared with each other by applying them for the analysis of five triazole pesticides (penconazole, hexaconazole, diniconazole, tebuconazole and triticonazole) in aqueous samples by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). In the AALLME method, which excludes any disperser solvent, much less volume of organic solvent is used. In… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-7 of 7 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…