Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

@article{Falagas2008ComparisonOP,
  title={Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses},
  author={M. Falagas and E. Pitsouni and G. Malietzis and G. Pappas},
  journal={The FASEB Journal},
  year={2008},
  volume={22},
  pages={338 - 342}
}
The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. [...] Key Method The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency.Expand
Retrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
The Impact of the Internet on Cancer Outcomes
World Wide Web hepatitis B virus resources.
Google Scholar: A source for clinicians?
  • Jim Henderson
  • Medicine, Computer Science
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • 2005
World Wide Web resources on antimicrobial resistance.
  • M. Falagas, E. A. Karveli
  • Medicine
  • Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
  • 2006
Extracting knowledge from the World Wide Web
  • M. Henzinger, S. Lawrence
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2004
The excitement of Google Scholar, the worry of Google Print
FALAGAS ET AL
  • FALAGAS ET AL
  • 2008
...
1
2
...