Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

@article{Falagas2008ComparisonOP,
  title={Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses},
  author={M. Falagas and E. Pitsouni and G. Malietzis and G. Pappas},
  journal={The FASEB Journal},
  year={2008},
  volume={22},
  pages={338 - 342}
}
  • M. Falagas, E. Pitsouni, +1 author G. Pappas
  • Published 2008
  • Medicine, Biology
  • The FASEB Journal
  • The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. [...] Key Method The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency.Expand Abstract
    Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar
    96

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES
    Google Scholar: A source for clinicians?
    70
    Extracting knowledge from the World Wide Web
    54
    The excitement of Google Scholar, the worry of Google Print
    27
    FALAGAS ET AL
    • 2008
    The FASEB Journal
      The impact factor game : it is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature
      • 2006