Comparison of Empirical Success Rates of Global vs . Partitioned Fixed-Priority and EDF Scheduling for Hard Real Time TR-050601

@inproceedings{Baker2005ComparisonOE,
  title={Comparison of Empirical Success Rates of Global vs . Partitioned Fixed-Priority and EDF Scheduling for Hard Real Time TR-050601},
  author={Theodore P. Baker},
  year={2005}
}
Improvements in schedulability tests for global fixed-priority and EDF scheduling in a homogeneous multiprocessor (symmetric multiprocessing) environment have shown that the worst-case guaranteed achievable utilization levels for global EDF scheduling equals what can be achieved with partitioned scheduling, and both ways of applying EDF scheduling out-perform fixed-priority scheduling, for sets of independent periodic or sporadic hard-deadline tasks with deadline equal to period. However, less… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 11 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS
Highly Cited
This paper has 75 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

8 Figures & Tables

Topics

Statistics

051015'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18
Citations per Year

75 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 75 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.