Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz

@inproceedings{Moshirfar2017ComparisonAA,
  title={Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz},
  author={Majid Moshirfar and Tirth J. Shah and David Franklin Skanchy and Steven H. Linn and Paul Kang and Daniel S. Durrie},
  booktitle={Clinical ophthalmology},
  year={2017}
}
PURPOSE To compare and analyze the differences in visual outcomes between Visx iDesign Advanced WaveScan Studio™ System, Alcon Wavelight Allegro Topolyzer and Nidek EC-5000 using Final Fit™ Custom Ablation Treatment Software from the submitted summary of safety and effectiveness of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data. METHODS In this retrospective comparative study, 334 eyes from Visx iDesign, 212 eyes from Alcon Contour, and 135 eyes from Nidek CATz platforms were analyzed for… CONTINUE READING
3
Twitter Mentions

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES

Advances in Refractive Surgery: May 2013 to June 2014.

  • Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology
  • 2015
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS

Topography-guided ablation: pros and cons

C. Kent
  • Review of Ophthalmology
  • 2012
VIEW 1 EXCERPT

Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004

S Vitale, RD Sperduto, FL. Ferri
  • Arch Ophthalmol
  • 2009
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS