• Corpus ID: 35837350

Comparing the Accuracy of IPv 4 and IPv 6 Geolocation Databases

@inproceedings{Kester2016ComparingTA,
  title={Comparing the Accuracy of IPv 4 and IPv 6 Geolocation Databases},
  author={J. J. Kester},
  year={2016}
}
IPv4 geolocation has been around for some time, but IPv6 geolocation is relatively new. This raises the question as to how the accuracy of IPv6 geolocation compares to the accuracy of IPv4 geolocation. Since IPv6 geolocation is a reasonably new topic, litte research has been done on its accuracy. In this study the accuracy is measured using a ground truth consisting of very precise locations of known computer systems. Different IP geolocation databases were queried and the resulting locations… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
On the accuracy of IP geolocation based on IP allocation data
The Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) pub- lish information about all allocated IPv4 and IPv6 address blocks including country codes for each block. This information can be used for IP address
IPv6 Geolocation Using Latency Constraints
TLDR
This study looked at using constraint-based geolocation (CBG) on IPv6 infrastructure and analyzed location accuracy against ground truth and showed that overall IPv6 CBG had up to 30% larger average error distance estimates as compared to IPv4 CBG, however, CBG performance varied depending on the location of the target host.
IP geolocation databases: unreliable?
TLDR
This is the first study using a ground truth showing that the overly fine granularity of database entries makes their accuracy worse, not better, and quantifies the accuracy of geolocation databases on a large European ISP based on ground truth information.
Improving IP geolocation by crawling the internet PoP level graph
TLDR
A novel algorithm is presented that crawls the Internet PoP level graph to improve the accuracy ofGeolocation, combining information from both geolocation databases and delay measurements, and shows that the results provided are more accurate than geolocated databases information while avoiding the pitfalls of delay measurements' usage.
Posit: a lightweight approach for IP geolocation
TLDR
A new lightweight approach to IP geolocation that requires only a small number of delay measurements conducted to end host targets in conjunction with a computationally-efficient statistical embedding technique, and performs better than all existing geolocated tools across a wide spectrum of measurement infrastructures with varying geographic densities.
Geocompare: a comparison of public and commercial geolocation databases - Technical Report
TLDR
A systematic quantitative comparison of currently available geolocation service providers using a methodology that compares each database against the majority vote across all databases with answers for a given IP address, using an 80 km threshold for two lat-longs coordinates to be in the same geographic region.
Towards IP geolocation using delay and topology measurements
TLDR
Topology-based Geolocation (TBG), a novel approach to estimating the geographic location of arbitrary Internet hosts by leveraging network topology, along with measurements of network delay, to constrain host position, improves the consistency of location estimates.
Spotter: A model based active geolocation service
TLDR
This paper presents a novel probabilistic approach, called Spotter, for estimating the geographic position of Internet devices with remarkable precision, and is the first to use this novel ground truth containing over 23000 network routers with their geographic locations.
Enhancing the classification accuracy of IP geolocation
TLDR
The proposed Enhanced Learning Classifier approach for estimating the geolocation of Internet hosts with increased accuracy improves average accuracy by geolocating internet hosts 100 miles closer to the true geographic location versus prior measurement-based approaches.
...
...