Comparing holistic and atomistic evaluation of evidence

Abstract

Fact finders in legal trials often need to evaluate a mass of weak, contradictory and ambiguous evidence. There are two general ways to accomplish this task: by holistically forming a coherent mental representation of the case, or by atomistically assessing the probative value of each item of evidence and integrating the values according to an algorithm… (More)

Topics

10 Figures and Tables

Slides referencing similar topics