Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size

@article{McCarty2001ComparingTM,
  title={Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size},
  author={C. McCarty and P. Killworth and H. Bernard and E. Johnsen and G. Shelley},
  journal={Human Organization},
  year={2001},
  volume={60},
  pages={28-39}
}
  • C. McCarty, P. Killworth, +2 authors G. Shelley
  • Published 2001
  • Geography
  • Human Organization
  • In this paper we compare two methods for estimating the size of personal networks using a nationally representative sample of the United States. Both methods rely on the ability of respondents to estimate the number of people they know in specific subpopulations of the U.S. (e.g., diabetics, Native Americans) and people in particular relation categories (e.g., immediate family, coworkers). The results demonstrate a remarkable similarity between the average network size generated by both methods… CONTINUE READING
    293 Citations
    Estimating Population Size Using the Network Scale Up Method.
    • 24
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    How Many People Do You Know?: Efficiently Estimating Personal Network Size
    • 126
    • PDF
    How Many People Do You Know in Prison?
    • 155
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Thirty Years of The Network Scale up Method.
    • PDF
    Two interpretations of reports of knowledge of subpopulation sizes
    • 42
    • PDF
    Estimation of the Active Network Size of Kermanian Males
    • 27
    • PDF
    Effect of estimation method, definition of ratio, and the plausible range in estimating social network size
    • 2
    • Highly Influenced

    References