Comparing Self-stereotyping with In-group-stereotyping and Out-group-stereotyping in Unequal-status Groups: The Case of Gender

  title={Comparing Self-stereotyping with In-group-stereotyping and Out-group-stereotyping in Unequal-status Groups: The Case of Gender},
  author={Mara Cadinu and Marcella Latrofa and Andrea Carnaghi},
  journal={Self and Identity},
  pages={582 - 596}
We compared self-stereotyping, in-group-stereotyping, and out-group-stereotyping, among members of high- and low-status groups. Because gender inequality is still present in society, we operationalized status in terms of gender. We considered the male (female) gender category to possess relatively high (low) status. As predicted on the basis of an extension of Mullen's model (1991), Italian men showed significant levels of out-group-stereotyping, but no significant levels of self-stereotyping… 

Chameleonic social identities: Context induces shifts in homosexuals' self-stereotyping and self-categorization

Do people align their self-concepts to the environment? It was predicted that low-status (homosexuals), but not high-status group members (heterosexuals), respond to environmental cues by shifting

Dynamics in the Contents of Self-Stereotyping and its Implication in Inter-Group Relations

Objectives. Developing a comprehensive model to understand intergroup relationship through integrating two constructs usually used to be examined discretely; self-stereotyping and stereotyping.

Self-Depersonalization and Ingroup Favoritism in Minimal Group Hierarchies

Research suggests that members of low-status groups are more likely than members of high-status groups to show self-depersonalization and to favor ingroup members over outgroup members. The present

Gender stereotypes in UK children and adolescents: Changing patterns of knowledge and endorsement.

It is suggested that in contemporary UK some progress is being made in relation to girls challenging stereotypes that work against them but that more work is needed to encourage boys into female-dominated disciplines.

Group meaningfulness and the causal direction of influence between the ingroup and the self or another individual: Evidence from the Induction-Deduction Paradigm

The goal of the present study was to investigate the causal direction of influence between the ingroup as a whole and the self or another ingroup member considering a key feature of groups, i.e., their perceived meaningfulness, and it is expected that the meaningfulness attributed to a group moderates the direction of causality between individual and ingroup perception.

The identification-similarity relationship as a function of ingroup status: A social identity perspective

ABSTRACT This research examined the role of ingroup status in the relationship between ingroup identification and self-ingroup similarity. Studies 1a-1b showed that this relationship was stronger in

Collectivism and Individualism in Status Hierarchies: Socialization and Social Identity Explanations

Social scientists have produced major theoretical and empirical advances documenting the importance of group status in shaping the group members’ perceptions of themselves and of society at large.

On the Origin of Beliefs about the Sexual Orientation and Gender-role Development of Children Raised by Gay-male and Heterosexual Parents: An Italian Study

In three studies, heterosexual participants were presented with descriptions of heterosexual and gay-male parents. Importantly, the level of gender-role conformity of the gay-male parents was

An Integrative Model of Social Identification

The Integrative Model of Social Identification (IMSI) is presented and it is postulate that there are two cognitive pathways to self–group overlap that can simultaneously yet distinctly explain social identification: self-stereotyping and self-anchoring.

Determining Gender Stereotype based on Physical Appearance Expectations in Interpersonal Communication Process: An Intercultural Comparison between Turkey and Portugal

  • Derya Gul Unlu
  • Psychology
    Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
  • 2021
While making inferences about the physical appearance of other persons, the individual makes use of various stereotypes, and according to these stereotypes, categorizes the new individual based on



Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status.

In 2 laboratory experiments, the tendency to stereotype oneself in terms of one's group membership as a function of the social context was examined and confirmed the prediction that minority members are more likely than majority members to stereotype themselves.

Gender differences in implicit gender self-categorization lead to stronger gender self-stereotyping by women than by men

It was hypothesized that, in natural group contexts, low-status in-group membership would be highly accessible, whereas membership to high-status groups would not. Therefore, gender group membership

Self-Stereotyping: The Central Role of an Ingroup Threatening Identity

The findings supported the idea that only low-status group members protected themselves when their group identity was threatened through increased self-stereotyping, and motivated them to protect their self-perception by increasing their similarity with the ingroup.

Development of new group members' in-group and out-group stereotypes: changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism.

Although out-groups were initially perceived as more dispersed than in-groups, decreased out-group dispersion resulted in a shift towardOut-group homogeneity, and Ethnocentrism was present at every wave but decreased because of decreased in-group positivity.

Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members

Four experiments were conducted to explore the hypothesis that in-group members perceive their own group as more variegated and complex than do out-group members (the out-group homogeneity

Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals.

Across the 4 studies, strong evidence for the role of in-group stereotyping as mediator of the effect of gender on self-construal was observed on the relational dimension but not on the agentic dimension.

Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification

In four studies, effects of self-perceived or public-perceived threats to group status or group distinctiveness on self-stereotyping (defined as similarity to prototypical in-group members) were

Self-stereotyping and self-enhancement in gender groups

This study investigated the effects of sex membership and its salience on individuals' self-stereotyping and the motivation to define oneself positively (self-enhancement). Bem's (1981) gender-schema

The Cognitive Representation of Self-Stereotyping

The present work looks at the self-stereotyping process and reveals its underlying cognitive structure, finding that the status of one’s social group was found to be a key variable in this process, showing that self-Stereotypesing is limited to low-status group members.

Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories

Recent research (Hogg & Turner, 1985a, b) favours a social identity rather than group cohesiveness analysis of group behaviour and psychological group formation. It is argued that individual