Comparing Optima: Do Simplifying Assumptions Affect Conclusions?

  title={Comparing Optima: Do Simplifying Assumptions Affect Conclusions?},
  author={Paul R. Milgrom},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  pages={607 - 615}
  • P. Milgrom
  • Published 1 June 1994
  • Economics
  • Journal of Political Economy
Consider a family of maximization models in which the optimum trades off beneficial and costly effects. Then comparative statics derived under many kinds of simplifying assumptions about the benefits technology are also true for general (convex and nonconvex) technologies. For example, any comparative statics conclusion about investment by a risk-averse decision maker under uncertainty that holds when expected returns are described by a general linear function also holds for an arbitrary… 

Monotone Comparative Statics under Uncertainty

This paper analyzes monotone comparative statics predictions in several classes of stochastic optimization problems. The main results characterize necessary and sufficient conditions for comparative

Comparative statics for state-contingent technologies

The implications of supermodularity conditions in comparative-static analysis are analyzed for a generalized version of the separable-effort representation of a firm facing stochastic prices and a

The Comparative Statics of Constrained Optimization Problems

This paper develops and applies some new results in the theory of monotone comparative statics. Let f be a real-valued function defined on R-super-l and consider the problem of maximizing f(x) when x

Dual Approaches to the Analysis of Risk Aversion

We present a dual formulation of choice under uncertainty based on a few simple assumptions about preferences. It is shown that the additive separability restriction on preferences, key to

Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty: Single Crossing Properties and Log-Supermodularity

This paper develops necessary and sufficient conditions for monotone comparative statics predictions in several general classes of stochastic optimization problems. There are two main results, where

Supermodularity and the Comparative Statics of Risk

In this article, it is shown that a wide range of comparative statics results from expected utility theory can be extended to generalized expected utility models using the tools of supermodularity

Dynamic Monotonicity and Comparative Statics for Real Options

Abstract We analyze the relationship between complementarities and monotonicity in dynamic programs. While complementarities (supermodularity and nondecreasing differences) are sufficient for

Strict Monotonicity in Comparative Statics

This note provides sufficient conditions to draw strict monotone comparative statics conclusions in optimization problems. These results extend the lattice-theoretic results of Milgrom and Shannon

Investment and information value for a risk averse firm

This paper analyzes the problem faced by a risk-averse firm considering how much to invest in a risky project. The firm receives a signal about the value of the project. We derive necessary and

Equilibrium Analysis in the Behavioral Neoclassical Growth Model

Rich behavioral biases, mistakes and limits on rational decision-making are often thought to make equilibrium analysis much more intractable. We show that this is not the case in the context of the



Monotone Comparative Statics

The authors derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the solution set of an optimization problem to be monotonic in the parameters of the problem. In addition, they develop practical methods


the existing theory by establishing the economic significance of the partial relative risk aversion function. Let u(t) be a utility function for wealth. The functions A(t) = -u"(t)/u'(t) and R(t)

Comparing Equilibria." A.E.R

  • 1994

Comparing Equilibria

  • A.E.R

" Comparing Equilibria . " A . E . R . 84 ( June 1994 ) . Milgrom , Paul , and Shannon , Chris . " Monotone Comparative Statics