Comparing Apples to Oranges: Differences in Women’s and Men’s Incarceration and Sentencing Outcomes

@article{Butcher2017ComparingAT,
  title={Comparing Apples to Oranges: Differences in Women’s and Men’s Incarceration and Sentencing Outcomes},
  author={Kristin F. Butcher and K. Park and A. Piehl},
  journal={Journal of Labor Economics},
  year={2017},
  volume={35},
  pages={S201 - S234}
}
  • Kristin F. Butcher, K. Park, A. Piehl
  • Published 2017
  • Economics, Psychology
  • Journal of Labor Economics
  • Using detailed administrative records, we find that, on average, women receive lighter sentences in comparison with men along both extensive and intensive margins. Using parametric and semiparametric decomposition methods, roughly 30% of the gender differences in incarceration cannot be explained by the observed criminal characteristics of offense and offender. We also find evidence of considerable heterogeneity across judges in their treatment of female and male offenders. There is little… CONTINUE READING
    The Persistence of the Criminal Justice Gender Gap: Evidence from 200 Years of Judicial Decisions
    • 3
    • PDF
    Sentences and prosecutors’ demands for aggravated drunk driving in Finland
    • 1

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
    Gender and Sentencing of Drug Offenders: Is Chivalry Dead?
    • 80
    Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases
    • 59
    • PDF
    Male Incarceration, the Marriage Market, and Female Outcomes
    • 170
    • PDF
    The Impact of Incarceration in State Prison on the Employment Prospects of Women
    • 75
    • PDF
    Juvenile Incarceration, Human Capital and Future Crime: Evidence from Randomly-Assigned Judges
    • 310
    • PDF
    THE CRIMINAL AND LABOR MARKET IMPACTS OF INCARCERATION
    • 127
    • PDF
    Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts*
    • 262