Comparative study of Lippmann's and Hayek's liberalisms (or neo-liberalisms)

  title={Comparative study of Lippmann's and Hayek's liberalisms (or neo-liberalisms)},
  author={F. Clave},
  journal={The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought},
  pages={978 - 999}
  • F. Clave
  • Published 15 October 2015
  • History
  • The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Abstract Walter Lippmann and Friedrich Hayek were both involved in the reconstruction of liberalism, or the emergence of neo-liberalism. This article will show that although the two authors treated similar themes, i.e. information and knowledge, economy, law, and politics, they addressed them in a radically different way. Hayek's approach was more individualistic, more related to the economy, to the concept of spontaneous order and to the limitation of politics by the law. In contrast, Lippmann… 
3 Citations
Reconstructing Liberalism: Hayek, Lippmann and the Making of Neoliberalism
Neoliberalism is a contested concept. The term was coined in the late 1930s/early 1940s to describe the emergent theory shared by different thinkers such as Friedrich Hayek, Walter Eucken, Henry
Between Fatalism and Hope: The Continental Liberal Search for Light and Stability in a Dark Age
This paper analyzes the work of Wilhelm Ropke, Friedrich Hayek and Bertrand de Jouvenel in the years leading up to, during and following WWII. It argues that these three political-economic thinkers
Walter Lippmann and the Austrian School: Towards a Deeper Epistemological Convergence
  • J. Higgins
  • Philosophy
    Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Frank Knight's Risk, Uncertainty and Profit at 100
  • 2021


Walter Lippmann et le néolibéralisme de La Cité Libre
In this article, we aim to highlight the main lines of Walter Lippmann's project of rebuilding liberalism in his book The Good Society (1937a). First we expose the historical context and the author's
Freedom, the Common Good, and the Rule of Law: Lippmann and Hayek on Economic Planning
This article examines the intellectual relationship between Friedrich Hayek and Walter Lippmann in the 1930s and 1940s, and argues that Lippmann's writings on economic planning were a neglected
A Preface to Morals
After an eloquent and moving analysis of what he sees as the disillusion of themodern age, Lippmann posits as the central dilemma of liberalism its inability to find an appropriate substitute for the
The Public Philosophy
Begun in 1938 and completed only in 1955, "The Public Philosophy "offers as much a glimpse into the private philosophy of America's premier journalist of the twentieth century as it does a public
At the Origins of Neo-Liberalism: The Free Economy and the Strong State, 1930–1947*
  • B. Jackson
  • History, Economics
    The Historical Journal
  • 2010
ABSTRACT It is often suggested that the earliest theorists of neo-liberalism first entered public controversy in the 1930s and 1940s to dispel the illusion that the welfare state represented a stable
The Phantom Public
In an era disgusted with politicians and the various instruments of "direct democracy," Walter Lippmann's The Phantom Public remains as relevant as ever. It reveals Lippmann at a time when he was
Information and Knowledge: Austrian Economics in Search of its Uniqueness
The Austrian School of Economics since WWII has increasingly claimed a unique position within the scientific community of economists. This paper argues that the most persuasive way to make this claim
Freedom and the Law
The greatest obstacle to rule of law in our time, contends the author of this thought-provoking work, is the problem of overlegislation. In modern democratic societies, legislative bodies are
Walter Lippmann: Public Economist
Walter Lippmann was the most distinguished American journalist and public philosopher of the twentieth century. But he was also something more: a public economist who helped millions of ordinary
The Constitution of Liberty
From the $700 billion bailout of the banking industry to president Barack Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package to the highly controversial passage of federal health-care reform, conservatives and