Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

@article{Cipriani2011ComparativeEA,
  title={Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis},
  author={A. Cipriani and C. Barbui and G. Salanti and J. Rendell and J. Geddes},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={2011},
  volume={378},
  pages={1306-1315}
}
  • A. Cipriani, C. Barbui, +2 authors J. Geddes
  • Published 2011
  • Medicine
  • The Lancet
  • BACKGROUND Conventional meta-analyses have shown inconsistent results for efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acute mania. We did a multiple-treatments meta-analysis, which accounted for both direct and indirect comparisons, to assess the effects of all antimanic drugs. METHODS We systematically reviewed 68 randomised controlled trials (16,073 participants) from Jan 1, 1980, to Nov 25, 2010, which compared any of the following pharmacological drugs at therapeutic dose range for the… CONTINUE READING

    Paper Mentions

    INTERVENTIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL
    Background: Bipolar disorder is one of the most common mental illnesses affecting 1%-4% of the population, and one of the leading causes of worldwide disability. Mania is a… Expand
    ConditionsBipolar Disorder
    InterventionDrug
    Treatment of bipolar disorder
    • 296
    • PDF
    New treatment guidelines for acute bipolar mania: a critical review.
    • 89
    Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry
    • 102
    A network meta-analysis on comparative efficacy and all-cause discontinuation of antimanic treatments in acute bipolar mania.
    • 49
    • Highly Influenced
    Atypical Antipsychotic Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    • 78
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES
    Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
    • 27,261
    • PDF