Comparative Study of Efficacy of Misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour

@inproceedings{Gupta2016ComparativeSO,
  title={Comparative Study of Efficacy of Misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour},
  author={Swaran Gupta and Jyoti Hak and Dinesh Kumar},
  year={2016}
}
Induction of labour implies the artificial initiation of uterine contractions after the period of viability by medical and / or surgical method for the purpose of vaginal delivery. It is indicated when there is risk of continuation of pregnancy either to the mother (or) the foetus (1). Induction primarily refers to attempt to produce regular uterine contractions along with cervical changes to begin the active phase of labour (2). To be successful, induction of labour must fulfill three aims… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

S Kulshreshtha, P Sharma, G Mohan, S Singh
  • J Obstet Gynaecol India
  • 2011
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Comparison of mnisoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at full term pregnancy

N Gupta, SL Mishra, J Shradha
  • Gujarat Medical J
  • 2013

Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour

D Buser, G Mora, F Arias
  • IndJ Physiol Pharmacol
  • 2007

A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction

P Danielian, B Porter, N Ferri, J Summers, A Templeton
  • J Obstet Gynaecol
  • 2006

One year randomized trial comparing oral v / s vaginal misoprostol tablets for induction of labour in term pregnancies

MV Shibira
  • J Obstet Gynaecol
  • 2006