Comparative Analysis of Principal Components Can be Misleading.

@article{Uyeda2015ComparativeAO,
  title={Comparative Analysis of Principal Components Can be Misleading.},
  author={Josef C. Uyeda and Daniel S Caetano and Matthew W. Pennell},
  journal={Systematic biology},
  year={2015},
  volume={64 4},
  pages={677-89}
}
Most existing methods for modeling trait evolution are univariate, although researchers are often interested in investigating evolutionary patterns and processes across multiple traits. Principal components analysis (PCA) is commonly used to reduce the dimensionality of multivariate data so that univariate trait models can be fit to individual principal components. The problem with using standard PCA on phylogenetically structured data has been previously pointed out yet it continues to be… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
18 Citations
64 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 18 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 64 references

Phylogenetic prinicpal components analysis and geometric morphometrics

  • D. P. Polly, A. M. Lawing, A. Fabre, A. Goswami.
  • Hystrix 24:33–41.
  • 2013
Highly Influential
11 Excerpts

A phylogenetic

  • K. Bartoszek, J. Pienaar, P. Mostad, S. Andersson, T. F. Hansen
  • 2012
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Random walk as a null model for high-dimensional morphometrics

  • F. L. Bookstein
  • 2012
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…