• Corpus ID: 152698393

Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings

  title={Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings},
  author={Jenny Fry and Charles Oppenheim and Claire Creaser and William Johnson and Mark A. C. Summers and Sonya White and Geoff Butters and Jenny Craven and Jillian R. Griffiths and Dick Hartley},
This report looks at how researchers publish and why, including the motivations that lead them to publish in different formats and the increase in collaboration and co-authorship. It also explores how researchers decide what to cite and the influence of research assessment on their behaviours and attitudes. 
Scholarly Communication: A Long View
This article reviews the different approaches taken by scholars and researchers in communicating with each other. It thematically considers the options available from the standpoints of information
PEER behavioural research: authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. D4.2 final report.
The aim of the Behavioural research project was to address the role of stage-two manuscript repositories in the scholarly and scientific communication system by exploring perceptions, motivations and behaviours of authors and readers.
Drivers and Obstacles of Open Access Publishing. A Qualitative Investigation of Individual and Institutional Factors
Open Access (OA) is an evolving publication model that is heavily supported by politics and science organizations aiming to make scientific knowledge more accessible to a wider audience. Whether it
Communicating Knowledge: How UK Researchers’ Decisions on Where and How to Disseminate their Research Results is Affected by Both the Changing Technological Environment and Research Evaluation
This paper presents evidence gathered via a research project undertaken by Manchester Metropolitan and Loughborough Universities during 2009. Data was gathered using bibliometric analysis, focus
Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK
The dissemination practices and impacts of applied and public health researchers working across the UK are described to describe how a range of dissemination activities are being applied albeit in an ad hoc fashion.
Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study
An examination of the behaviours and attitudes of academic researchers as producers and consumers of scholarly information resources in the digital era in respect to how they determine authority and trustworthiness in the sources they use, cite, and publish in is provided.
Do Younger Researchers Assess Trustworthiness Differently When Deciding What to Read and Cite and Where to Publish
An international survey of over 3600 academic researchers examined how trustworthiness is determined when making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing in the digital age and whether
More journal articles and fewer books: Publication practices in the social sciences in the 2010’s
The number of scholarly journal articles published each year is growing, but little is known about the relationship between journal article growth and other forms of scholarly dissemination (e.g.,


Publication outlets and their effect on academic writers’ citations
How and why the publication outlets in which academic writers’ work appears can impact on their citations is focused on, as part of a qualitative interview-based study of computer scientists’ and sociologists’ citing behaviour.
Research dissemination and invocation on the Web
The importance of the Web as a new medium for disseminating and promoting scholarly research is discussed. Particular attention is paid to its potential to provide evidence of wider impact for
“The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?”
Based on a survey of 1554 researchers funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the results of the multivariate regressions indicate that various factors explain the decision of whether or not to collaborate with industry and the government.
Does place of publication influence citation behavior?
Data derived from studies of Philippine scientists and Korean mathematicians do suggest that place of publication may exert some influence on citation behavior, and a scientist is more likely to cite national sources when publishing in a national journal than when publishing internationally.
Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper.
The lengthy route taken to get a methodological paper about pilot studies into print is described and it is demonstrated that getting into print often depends on a range of factors, not just the quality of the written text.
The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields
It is suggested that Whitley's theory of the social organization of scholarly fields can be effectively used as an explanatory model of e-journal use across scientific fields to incorporate a fuller understanding of the cultural characteristics of scientific specialisms.
Towards a continuum of scholarship: The eventual collapse of the distinction between grey and non-grey literature
This paper argues that the distinction between grey and non-grey (or white) literature will become less relevant over time, as online discovery options proliferate. In the meantime, the political
The future of research monographs: an international set of perspectives
This Forum makes four points. First, it expands our knowledge on the writing and publishing of research monographs in different countries and so it moves beyond accounts which generalize from the UK
How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication
Three types of judgments about cited works were found to best predict citation: that the work was novel, well-known, and a concept-marker; that citing it might promote the authority of one’s own work; and that it deserved criticism.