Common errors of reasoning in child protection work.

@article{Munro1999CommonEO,
  title={Common errors of reasoning in child protection work.},
  author={Eileen Munro},
  journal={Child abuse \& neglect},
  year={1999},
  volume={23 8},
  pages={
          745-58
        }
}
  • E. Munro
  • Published 1 August 1999
  • Psychology
  • Child abuse & neglect

Tables from this paper

Beliefs of helping professionals within the context of child sexual abuse assessment

Background: Child sexual abuse (CSA) is one of the most serious socio-pathological phenomena. However, its identification is challenging and linked to the risk of false positive and false negative

Alice in recidivism land: The Queens logic and child protection workers' assessment of sexual dangerousness

This article is based on a case that highlights the dearth of cogent and pertinent risk assessment information in the reports and testimonies of many involved in assessing risks to children in real

Expert Testimony on Child Sexual Abuse:a Qualitative Study of the Swedish Approach toStatement Analysis

The purpose of the present study was to explore the Swedish application of statement analysis, developed by Dr. Arne Trankell, and focus on the way experts integrated data, and how they interpreted the results of their evaluations.

Allegations against people working with children : A study of initial decision making.

The study explores the initial decision making of managers within services for children when faced with an allegation of abuse against a member of staff and suggests that awareness of specific safeguarding procedures for the management of allegations did not enhance practice or decision making, and could operate to blur responsibility for decision making.

Inquiries into Fatal Child Abuse in the Netherlands: A Source of Improvement?

This paper examines for the first time all Dutch public inquiry reports into child abuse fatalities and shows that the problems highlighted in the reports are highly similar to those recurring in their British counterparts.

Mental health tragedies: investigating beyond human error

The Department of Health is introducing a mandatory reporting system for adverse events in the NHS which will replace the statutory inquiries held when someone with a mental illness commits a

Hear no evil, see no evil: understanding failure to identify and report child sexual abuse in institutional contexts

This report suggests that a new approach that seeks a deeper understanding of why errors occur would be more effective in encouraging safe practices in the future. Executive Summary: The failure to

Systematic review of models of analysing significant harm

This review aims to build on the conceptual model established by The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, hereafter known as the ‘Assessment Framework’, and provides a concise conceptual model that is accessible and comprehensive for practitioners to use.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES

Avoidable and Unavoidable Mistakes in Child Protection Work

This article argues that social workers and the general public need a clear understanding of the distinction between avoidable and unavoidable mistakes in child protection work. The public is

Child protection practice : private risks and public remedies : a study of decision-making, intervention and outcome in child protection work

Part I - The Background: A brief history of child protection by Roy Parker Research methods and design The follow-up sample. Part II - Early Decision-Making: The investigation Early protective action

Risk assessment: the emperor's new clothes?

All current instruments used by child protection agencies have major methodological deficiencies that limit the utility of such instruments as a means of predicting future abusive or neglectful behavior, the authors argue.

Irrationality: The Enemy Within

New, 21st anniversary edition, with a new foreword by Ben Goldacre, author of Bad Science and Bad Pharma, and an afterword by James Ball, covering developments in our understanding of irrationality

Reasons for confidence.

People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's

Evaluating Child Protection

This work states that Aboriginal People and Child Protection Gender Issues in Child Redefining Child Protection are important issues that need to be addressed in the development of a child protection information system.

EARLY PREDICTION AND PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE

We may not be able to make you love reading, but early prediction and prevention of child abuse will lead you to love reading starting from now. Book is the window to open the new world. The world

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted,

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty are described: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development.
...